Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 31B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Gemma 4 E4B and Gemma 4 31B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, Gemma 4 31B scores highest: Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) at 19, against Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) at 9 for Gemma 4 E4B.
- For output speed, Gemma 4 E4B is fastest: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) at 46 t/s, against Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) at 36 t/s for Gemma 4 31B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |  Google | 19 | - | - | - | - | 17 | 21 | - | $0.0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 1.03s | 50.01s | 64.11s | - | 30.7B | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |    +11 | |||
| Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.2 | $0.14 | $0.40 | $0.14 | - | - | - | - | 36 | 2.20s | 2.20s | 16.20s | - | 30.7B | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |   +8 | |||
| Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Google | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.0 | $0.02 | $0.10 | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | 0.85s | 44.47s | 55.37s | - | 8B 4.5B active at inference time | 128k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text |  | |||
| Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.0 | $0.02 | $0.10 | - | - | - | - | - | 45 | 0.78s | 0.78s | 11.94s | - | 8B 4.5B active at inference time | 128k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text | | |||