Gemma 4 E2B vs Nova 2.0 Lite: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Gemma 4 E2B and Nova 2.0 Lite releases: 2 and 4 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 6 models.
- For intelligence, Nova 2.0 Lite scores highest: Nova 2.0 Lite (high) at 13, against Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) at 8 for Gemma 4 E2B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nova 2.0 Lite (high) | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.5 | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 164 | 14.07s | 26.25s | 29.29s | - | - | 1M | Oct 2025 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | |||
| Nova 2.0 Lite (medium) | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.5 | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 161 | 13.80s | 26.21s | 29.31s | - | - | 1M | Oct 2025 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | |||
| Nova 2.0 Lite (low) | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.5 | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 167 | 7.78s | 19.75s | 22.74s | - | - | 1M | Oct 2025 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | |||
| Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning) | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.5 | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 154 | 1.01s | 1.01s | 4.25s | - | - | 1M | Oct 2025 | - | No | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | |||
| Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5.1B 2.3B active at inference time | 128k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text and image | - | ||||
| Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5.1B 2.3B active at inference time | 128k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text and image | - | ||||