Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.5 122B A10B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, Gemma 4 31B scores highest: Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) at 19, against Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) at 18 for Qwen3.5 122B A10B.
- For output speed, Qwen3.5 122B A10B is fastest: Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) at 142 t/s, against Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) at 35 t/s for Gemma 4 31B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |  Google | 19 | - | - | - | - | 17 | 21 | - | $0.0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 1.03s | 50.07s | 64.20s | - | 30.7B | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |    +8 | |||
| Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) |  Alibaba | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.7 | $0.40 | $3.20 | - | - | - | - | - | 142 | 2.35s | 2.35s | 5.86s | - | 125B 10B active at inference time | 262k | Feb 2026 | - | No | Supports: text and image | Supports: text |  | |||
| Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Alibaba | 16 | 17 | 13 | 17 | - | 19 | 24 | $0.32 | $0.7 | $0.40 | $3.20 | - | $661 | 17k | 7k | 101M | 127 | 2.37s | 18.07s | 22.00s | 126.06s | 125B 10B active at inference time | 262k | Feb 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text |  +2 | |||
| Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.2 | $0.14 | $0.40 | $0.14 | - | - | - | - | 34 | 2.36s | 2.36s | 17.14s | - | 30.7B | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |   +6 | |||