Gemma 4 31B vs Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Gemma 4 31B and Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, Gemma 4 31B scores highest: Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) at 15, against Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Reasoning) at 7 for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B.
- For output speed, Gemma 4 31B is fastest: Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) at 47 t/s, against Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) at 43 t/s for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |  Google | 15 | 15 | 11 | 15 | - | 17 | 22 | $0.00 | $0.0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | - | $0 | 13k | 8k | 49M | 35 | 1.00s | 50.67s | 64.97s | 345.35s | 30.7B | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |    +11 | |||
| Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.2 | $0.14 | $0.40 | $0.14 | - | - | - | - | 47 | 1.95s | 1.95s | 12.64s | - | 30.7B | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |   +8 | |||
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Reasoning) |  Nous Research | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $1.2 | $1.00 | $3.00 | - | - | - | - | - | 41 | 2.47s | 50.66s | 62.71s | - | 406B | 128k | Aug 2025 | - | Yes | Supports: text | Supports: text |  | |||
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) | Nous Research | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $1.2 | $1.00 | $3.00 | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | 2.39s | 2.39s | 14.11s | - | 406B | 128k | Aug 2025 | - | No | Supports: text | Supports: text | | |||