Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Gemma 4 26B A4B and Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, Gemma 4 26B A4B scores highest: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) at 17, against Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) at 9 for Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5.
- For output speed, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 is fastest: Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) at 104 t/s, against Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) at 72 t/s for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) |  Google | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.1 | $0.115 | $0.37 | $0.085 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25.2B 3.8B active at inference time | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |   +4 | |||
| Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.2 | $0.13 | $0.40 | $0.125 | - | - | - | - | 72 | 1.29s | 1.29s | 8.20s | - | 25.2B 3.8B active at inference time | 256k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |   +4 | |||
| Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) |  NVIDIA | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.4 | $0.40 | $0.40 | - | - | - | - | - | 104 | 4.64s | 23.82s | 28.61s | - | 49B | 128k | Jul 2025 | - | Yes | Supports: text | Supports: text |  | |||
| Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning) | NVIDIA | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.4 | $0.40 | $0.40 | - | - | - | - | - | 97 | 4.97s | 4.97s | 10.12s | - | 49B | 128k | Jul 2025 | - | No | Supports: text | Supports: text | | |||