All Releases

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B: Release Comparison

Comparison of the Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B releases: 3 and 4 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.

  • For intelligence, Gemini 3.8 Flash scores highest: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) at 31, against Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) at 20 for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • For output speed, Gemini 3.8 Flash is fastest: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) at 131 t/s, against Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) at 51 t/s for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • For cost per task, Qwen3.8 27B is cheapest: Qwen3.8 27B (Low) at $1.91, against Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) at $6.26 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
Model Playground

Releases compared

Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (medium)Qwen3.8 27B (low)Qwen3.8 27B (non-reasoning)
Intelligence Index
31
30
22
20
17
16
10
Finance & Accounting
42
42
34
36
29
28
22
Strategy & Ops
47
47
35
39
34
29
16
Legal
42
42
33
33
26
27
22
Healthcare & Medical
38
38
31
35
24
23
19
Cost per TaskUSD
$7.77
$6.26
--
$3.53
$2.16
$1.91
$3.77
Output SpeedTokens/s
131
--
--
41
51
48
46
Time to First Tokens
24.89
--
--
4.01
4.08
3.93
3.96
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
256k
256k
256k
256k
Creator
Google
Google
Google
Alibaba
Alibaba
Alibaba
Alibaba
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open
Open
Open
Open
Input Modality

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text, image, and video

Supports: text, image, and video

Supports: text, image, and video

Supports: text, image, and video

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
Google
Google
Google
Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen3.8 27B
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Speed & Latency

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
No publicly available API

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash (high)AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
Lexically Varied
99%
1%
Metaphorical
96%
4%
Eloquent
88%
12%
Literate
83%
17%
Natural Sounding
55%
45%