All Releases

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3: Release Comparison

Comparison of the Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 releases: 3 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 5 models.

  • For intelligence, GLM-5.3 scores highest: GLM-5.3 (Max) at 32, against Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) at 31 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
  • For output speed, Gemini 3.8 Flash is fastest: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) at 130 t/s, against GLM-5.3 (Max) at 86 t/s for GLM-5.3.
  • For cost per task, GLM-5.3 is cheapest: GLM-5.3 (Low) at $1.57, against Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) at $6.26 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
Model Playground

Releases compared

GLM-5.3 (max)Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)GLM-5.3 (low)Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)
Intelligence Index
32
31
30
23
23
Finance & Accounting
42
42
42
31
34
Strategy & Ops
47
47
47
38
35
Legal
36
42
42
28
33
Healthcare & Medical
39
38
38
31
31
Cost per TaskUSD
$5.01
$7.77
$6.26
$1.57
--
Output SpeedTokens/s
86
130
--
82
--
Time to First Tokens
1.55
27.20
--
1.68
--
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
Creator
Z AI
Google
Google
Z AI
Google
License
Open
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open
Proprietary
Input Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
Google
Google
Google
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Gemini 3.8 Flash
GLM-5.3
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Speed & Latency

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
No publicly available API

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) vs GLM-5.3 (max)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash (high)Z AIGLM-5.3 (max)
Natural Sounding
1%
99%
Lexically Varied
5%
95%
Eloquent
12%
88%
Metaphorical
78%
22%
Literate
43%
57%