DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Wonder: Release Comparison
Comparison of the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Wonder releases: 3 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 5 models.
- For intelligence, Muse Wonder scores highest: Muse Wonder (Max) at 44, against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) at 33 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017.
- For time per task, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is fastest: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) at 7.0 min, against Muse Wonder (High) at 8.8 min for Muse Wonder.
- For cost per task, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheapest: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) at $0.43, against Muse Wonder (Max) at $6.95 for Muse Wonder.
| Muse Wonder (max) | Muse Wonder (high) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (high) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 44 | 41 | 33 | 29 | 19 |
| Finance & Accounting | 51 | 50 | 42 | 39 | 37 |
| Strategy & Ops | 54 | 54 | 49 | 48 | 40 |
| Legal | 47 | 46 | 38 | 34 | 32 |
| Healthcare & Medical | 49 | -- | 41 | -- | -- |
| Cost per TaskUSD | $6.95 | -- | $0.60 | $0.46 | $0.43 |
| Time per TaskMinutes | 12.1 | 8.8 | 13.3 | 10.3 | 7.0 |
| Time to First Answer Tokens | 20.56 | 10.24 | 50.85 | 24.32 | 1.29 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Creator | |||||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open | Open | Open |
| Input Modality | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image |
| Output Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text |
| Providers | |||||
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better