All Releases

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1: Release Comparison

Comparison of the Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 releases: 5 and 5 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 10 models.

  • For intelligence, Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores highest: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) at 55, against Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) at 50 for Claude Fable 5.1.
  • For time per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is fastest: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at 2.7 min, against Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) at 7.2 min for Claude Fable 5.1.
  • For cost per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheapest: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at $0.51, against Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) at $4.47 for Claude Fable 5.1.
Model Playground

Releases compared

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)Claude Fable 5.1 (max)Claude Fable 5.1 (high)Claude Fable 5.1 (medium)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Claude Fable 5.1 (low)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)
Intelligence Index
55
50
50
49
47
43
42
39
31
26
Finance & Accounting
56
54
49
54
50
47
44
48
41
36
Strategy & Ops
58
56
54
58
54
52
51
51
47
42
Legal
52
54
47
54
50
48
44
47
39
37
Healthcare & Medical
54
51
47
51
48
45
44
44
40
37
Cost per TaskUSD
$10.02
$10.85
$4.09
$12.99
$7.54
$5.56
$1.64
$4.47
$0.78
$0.51
Time per TaskMinutes
31.1
18.5
15.2
22.6
12.7
9.3
7.0
7.2
3.6
2.7
Time to First Answer Tokens
303.84
68.40
32.09
195.76
17.85
10.74
11.75
7.06
5.40
3.28
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
Creator
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input Modality

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
AnthropicMicrosoft AzureAmazon BedrockGoogle
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
GoogleAnthropicAmazon BedrockMicrosoft Azure
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Fable 5.1
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Speed & Latency

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (max)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5 (max)AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (max)
Eloquent
3%
97%
Natural Sounding
4%
96%
Lexically Varied
6%
94%
Metaphorical
27%
73%
Literate
41%
59%