Claude Opus 5.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Claude Opus 5.5 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B releases: 5 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.
- For output speed, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is fastest: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) at 270 t/s, against Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) at 96 t/s for Claude Opus 5.5.
| Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) | Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh with fallback) | Claude Opus 5.5 (high with fallback) | Claude Opus 5.5 (medium with fallback) | Claude Opus 5.5 (low with fallback) | Nemotron 3 Nano | Nemotron 3 Nano (non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 58 | 57 | 52 | 48 | 35 | -- | -- |
| Finance & Accounting | 59 | 56 | 53 | 51 | 42 | -- | -- |
| Strategy & Ops | 61 | 59 | 58 | 56 | 48 | -- | -- |
| Legal | 58 | 55 | 52 | 50 | 43 | -- | -- |
| Healthcare & Medical | 58 | 56 | 52 | 51 | 45 | -- | -- |
| Cost per TaskUSD | $10.04 | $6.05 | $3.46 | $2.45 | $0.98 | -- | -- |
| Output SpeedTokens/s | 96 | 84 | 81 | 81 | 80 | 254 | 270 |
| Time to First Tokens | 725.83 | 121.20 | 43.54 | 19.85 | 10.86 | 0.72 | 0.52 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Creator | |||||||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| Input Modality | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Supports: text |
| Output Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text |
| Providers | |||||||
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better