All Releases

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5.3: Release Comparison

Comparison of the Claude Haiku 5.5 and GLM-5.3 releases: 5 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.

  • For intelligence, GLM-5.3 scores highest: GLM-5.3 (Max) at 45, against Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) at 43 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
  • For output speed, Claude Haiku 5.5 is fastest: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) at 240 t/s, against GLM-5.3 (Low) at 88 t/s for GLM-5.3.
  • For cost per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheapest: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) at $0.02, against GLM-5.3 (Low) at $0.85 for GLM-5.3.
Model Playground

Releases compared

GLM-5.3 (max)Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)GLM-5.3 (low)Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Intelligence Index
45
43
41
38
34
34
29
Finance & Accounting
45
44
41
38
35
35
29
Strategy & Ops
48
40
39
37
34
39
28
Legal
42
42
40
38
36
33
31
Healthcare & Medical
42
40
35
34
32
33
27
Cost per TaskUSD
$2.01
$0.21
$0.12
$0.08
$0.05
$0.85
$0.02
Output SpeedTokens/s
86
240
195
185
174
88
181
Time to First Tokens
2.74
332.02
69.39
25.05
11.39
2.89
8.04
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
Creator
Z AI
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Z AI
Anthropic
License
Open
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open
Proprietary
Input Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text

Supports: text and image

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, and AA-LCR v1.1

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Claude Haiku 5.5
GLM-5.3
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Speed & Latency

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) vs GLM-5.3 (max)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5 (max)Z AIGLM-5.3 (max)
Eloquent
3%
97%
Lexically Varied
12%
88%
Natural Sounding
12%
88%
Metaphorical
17%
83%
Literate
68%
32%