Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 4 26B A4B releases: 5 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.
- For output speed, Claude Haiku 5.5 is fastest: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) at 241 t/s, against Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) at 122 t/s for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
| Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Gemma 4 26B A4B (non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 36 | 34 | 30 | 25 | 19 | -- | -- |
| Finance & Accounting | 44 | 41 | 38 | 35 | 29 | -- | -- |
| Strategy & Ops | 39 | 39 | 37 | 33 | 27 | -- | -- |
| Legal | 39 | 37 | 35 | 33 | 27 | -- | -- |
| Healthcare & Medical | 37 | 34 | 32 | 31 | 25 | -- | -- |
| Cost per TaskUSD | $0.41 | $0.25 | $0.16 | $0.09 | $0.04 | -- | -- |
| Output SpeedTokens/s | 241 | 196 | 187 | 175 | 185 | 96 | 122 |
| Time to First Tokens | 310.72 | 67.20 | 24.31 | 10.36 | 7.51 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 256k | 256k |
| Creator | |||||||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| Input Modality | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text, image, and video |
| Output Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text |
| Providers | |||||||
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better