Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 4 E2B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemma 4 E2B releases: 5 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.
- For intelligence, Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) at 53, against Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) at 8 for Gemma 4 E2B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |  Anthropic | 53 | 56 | 60 | 60 | 58 | 56 | 63 | $7.63 | $7.2 | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | $13,129 | 78k | 47k | 188M | 65 | 284.45s | 284.45s | 292.09s | 742.47s | - | 1M | Sep 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 53 | 56 | 58 | 61 | - | 57 | 62 | $5.98 | $7.2 | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | $9,063 | 61k | 34k | 121M | 61 | 125.81s | 125.81s | 134.02s | 617.87s | - | 1M | Sep 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 51 | 54 | 56 | 58 | - | 54 | 60 | $3.91 | $7.2 | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | $5,242 | 38k | 19k | 62M | 56 | 26.22s | 26.22s | 35.13s | 425.79s | - | 1M | Sep 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 49 | 51 | 54 | 57 | - | 51 | 58 | $2.98 | $7.2 | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | $3,983 | 28k | 12k | 44M | 56 | 10.26s | 10.26s | 19.20s | 310.86s | - | 1M | Sep 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 47 | 49 | 51 | 53 | - | 49 | 55 | $2.37 | $7.2 | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.25 | $3,158 | 22k | 8k | 33M | 56 | 6.65s | 6.65s | 15.56s | 245.69s | - | 1M | Sep 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) |  Google | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5.1B 2.3B active at inference time | 128k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text and image | - | |||
| Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5.1B 2.3B active at inference time | 128k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text and image | - | |||