Tencent Hy4 vs. Mistral Large 4 (High)
Comparison between Tencent Hy4 and Mistral Large 4 (High) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
| Intelligence | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 35 | 26 | |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1447 | 1348 | |
| AutomationBench-AA | 66% | 58% | |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 37% | 25% | |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 31% | 15% | |
| AA-Omniscience v1.1 | 5 | 5 | |
| GDP.pdf | 22% | 18% | |
| HLE-Diamond | 33% | 17% | |
| CritPt v2 (Hard Subset) | 39% | 27% | |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 13% | 4% | |
| Cost | |||
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.4463 | $0.399 | |
| Input Price per 1M Tokens | $0.834 | $0.70 | |
| Output Price per 1M Tokens | $2.501 | $2.10 | |
| Cache Hit Price per 1M Tokens | $0.042 | $0.07 | |
| Cost per Task | $2.06 | ||
| Cost to Run Intelligence Index | $1,359 | ||
| Token Use | |||
| Output Tokens per Task | 78.1k | 82k | |
| Reasoning Tokens per Task | 54.6k | 54.5k | |
| Output Tokens to Run Intelligence Index | 160M | 107M | |
| Performance | |||
| Technical specifications | |||
| Context Window | 1M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | |
| Release Date | November 2026 | October 2026 | |
| Total parameters | 1.1T | ||
| Active parameters | 52B | ||
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Input modality | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | |
| Output modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | ||
Time per Task
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Artificial Analysis Finance & Accounting Index
Evaluations
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Agentic SaaS workflows
Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal
Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories
Reasoning & knowledge
Professional document reasoning, All-pass
Agentic coding & terminal use
Physics reasoning
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate
Agentic business operations
Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo
Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo
Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Medical long context reasoning
Visual reasoning
Rich, varied, well-crafted language
Well-structured, scannable, answer-first
Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic
Use of filler and generic language
AA-Briefcase v1.1
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience v1.1
AA-Omniscience Net Score
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Tencent Hy4 is more intelligent. Tencent Hy4 scores 35, compared with Mistral Large 4 (High) at 26 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Mistral Large 4 (High) is cheaper. At a 7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio, Mistral Large 4 (High) costs $0.40 per 1M tokens (based on Mistral's API), compared with Tencent Hy4 at $0.45 per 1M tokens (based on Tencent's API).
Both models have a context window of 1M tokens.