All Releases

Muse Wonder Full vs GLM-5.3: Release Comparison

Comparison of the Muse Wonder Full and GLM-5.3 releases: 1 model and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 3 models.

  • For intelligence, Muse Wonder Full scores highest at 50, against GLM-5.3 (Max) at 32 for GLM-5.3.
Model Playground

Releases compared

Muse Wonder Full (max)GLM-5.3 (max)GLM-5.3 (low)
Intelligence Index
50
32
23
Finance & Accounting
55
42
31
Strategy & Ops
58
47
38
Legal
51
36
28
Healthcare & Medical
52
39
31
Cost per TaskUSD
--
$5.01
$1.57
Time per TaskMinutes
--
26.1
13.8
Time to First Answer Tokens
--
62.99
7.43
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
Creator
Meta
Z AI
Z AI
License
Proprietary
Open
Open
Input Modality

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text

Supports: text

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
--
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
No publicly available API
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
No publicly available API
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
No publicly available API

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode-AA 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
GLM-5.3
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Performance

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode-AA 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Personality Indexes

Each axis is one of 8 personality indexes: the mean of its traits’ Elo z-scores, percentile ranked from 1 to 100 across all models evaluated in the benchmark