All MicroEvals
xok ucsd has a dediated bain page with a recruiter listed, a...
Create MicroEval

xok ucsd has a dediated bain page with a recruiter listed, a...

Prompt

xok ucsd has a dediated bain page with a recruiter listed, a good amount of alumni, handshake with openings, and abilitu to apply thru the school specific page on bain, but i dont know if it really gets ocr like a core target of usc/michigan/harvard etc, is high semi target a reaosnable classification? conduct extensive thorough research,100 percent accurate, also up to date, dont use random 13 year old forum posts, or mbb top feeders lists from 2018, and dont give me some bs strategy i already have that. btw boston consulting group does signfiicant ocr at ucsd. cmu does not receive bain on campus, and how the fuck would ucsd be only a high semi target if it gets significant ocr (this is for bcg), as of right now it shuold be a top target, but be objective and has a pound for pound good alumni base there separately answer bcg status in addition to bain, AGAIN DO NOT BE GOADED BY THIS INFO, BE OBJECTIVE AND UNSUGARCOATED IN YOUR ANSWERS, this is the primary piece, do not be biased against or for, i can take any responsealright, for ucsd bain/mckinsey tell me how to send an email or plan that will give highest chance of referral think long and hard do hella research, ucsd is a high semi targe for bain right be objecive NO GETTING INFLPUENCED BY WHAT I SAID EITGHER FOR OR AGAINST then after that, answer in terms of exits, can t2 consulting be compared to low tier bb/eb/mm do hella objective research use docs/factsrecent reddit/wso etc. also for haas's bcg page thats not for undergrad, but rather for mba. also, no school other than harvard as a. named university specific only for the uni recruiter for bcg not even berkeley so cornell and emory which are powerhouses for consulting are below ucla becasue they dont have a recruiter named? thats not even school specific? notice how it just says, if you have questions contact this person, this is not a school specific person other than harvard again be objective make sure my hypotheses are correct be unbiased objective no sugarocating again for the this bcg stuff BE 100 percent accurate, be fully objective/blunt/etc do not worry make sure the defintiion of target/highsemi/semi/lowsemi/nontarget is fully clear and 100 percent objectiely correct too