Local AI Professional Workload Benchmark
Benchmark designed to compare LLMs for private local deployment serving 1–10 users. It evaluates reasoning, information extraction, instruction following, numerical analysis, prioritization, professional writing, and resistance to unsupported assumptions.
Prompt
You are an AI assistant running in a private local environment used by a small professional team. Your task is to analyze the information below and produce an accurate, actionable response for the user. The purpose of this task is to evaluate your ability to: - understand semi-structured business information, - distinguish facts from assumptions, - perform multi-step reasoning, - calculate accurately, - identify inconsistencies, - prioritize information, - follow strict output instructions, - and communicate clearly without inventing information. CASE A professional team is currently working on four activities: PROJECT A - Deadline: Thursday at 17:00 - Estimated remaining work: 6 hours - Business value: €8,000 - Client has explicitly stated that the deadline is critical. - One team member can work on it. - Current completion: 70% PROJECT B - Deadline: Friday at 12:00 - Estimated remaining work: 10 hours - Business value: €15,000 - Two team members can work on it simultaneously. - The client has not indicated that the deadline is critical. - Current completion: 50% PROJECT C - Deadline: Wednesday at 18:00 - Estimated remaining work: 3 hours - Business value: €3,000 - Missing information from the client prevents approximately one hour of the remaining work from being completed. - The requested information was sent to the client yesterday. - Current completion: 80% PROJECT D - No fixed deadline. - Estimated remaining work: 8 hours - Business value: €20,000 - Completing it this week would allow invoicing to happen approximately two weeks earlier. - Current completion: 60% AVAILABLE CAPACITY Three people are available: Alex: - Monday: 6 hours - Tuesday: 7 hours - Wednesday: 4 hours - Thursday: 6 hours - Friday: 5 hours Maria: - Monday: 4 hours - Tuesday: 5 hours - Wednesday: 7 hours - Thursday: 5 hours - Friday: 5 hours David: - Monday: 7 hours - Tuesday: unavailable - Wednesday: 6 hours - Thursday: 7 hours - Friday: 4 hours Additional constraints: - Only Alex can work on Project A. - Alex and Maria can work on Project B. - Any team member can work on Project C. - Maria and David can work on Project D. - No person can work on more than one project at the same time. - Assume the remaining-work estimates represent total person-hours. - Work can be split across different days and people unless explicitly restricted. - Today is Monday morning. NEW INFORMATION The following messages have also been received: Message 1: "The client for Project C says they expect to send the missing information by Wednesday morning." Message 2: "Project B may lead to a second contract worth approximately €25,000, but nothing has been signed or formally approved." Message 3: "Project A's client says that a delay beyond Thursday could affect their planned launch." Message 4: "David believes Project D could possibly be completed in six hours instead of eight, but this has not been validated." TASK Analyze the situation and respond using exactly the following structure: 1. FACTS List the most important facts that should influence planning. 2. UNCERTAINTIES Identify information that is uncertain, speculative, missing, or should not be treated as confirmed. 3. CAPACITY CHECK Calculate: - total available person-hours for the week, - remaining confirmed person-hours required by the four projects, - and whether there is enough total capacity to complete all confirmed work. Show your calculations. 4. PRIORITIZATION Propose a priority order for Projects A, B, C, and D. For each project, explain the reasoning in no more than three sentences. Do not treat speculative future revenue as confirmed revenue. 5. EXECUTION PLAN Create a practical allocation of work from Monday to Friday. Show: - person, - project, - day, - hours allocated. The plan must respect all stated constraints. If an exact allocation cannot be determined because of missing information, state the dependency clearly instead of inventing an answer. 6. RISKS Identify the five most important operational risks and provide one mitigation for each. 7. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Write a maximum 120-word summary suitable for a manager. IMPORTANT RULES - Do not invent facts. - Clearly distinguish confirmed information from estimates or speculation. - Check all arithmetic before answering. - Do not assume that higher contract value automatically means higher priority. - Respect all personnel restrictions. - Explicitly identify any dependency that could prevent a deadline from being met. - If multiple valid schedules exist, provide one valid schedule rather than claiming there is only one possible solution. - Keep the response concise and professional.
Answer guidance
A strong answer should: - Correctly calculate total weekly capacity as 76 person-hours. - Correctly calculate confirmed remaining workload as 27 person-hours: A = 6h B = 10h C = 3h D = 8h - Recognize that aggregate capacity is not the main constraint because projects have worker-specific restrictions and deadlines. - Identify Project A as deadline-sensitive and restricted to Alex. - Recognize that Project C has the earliest deadline but is partially blocked by external information. - Treat the possible €25,000 follow-on contract for Project B as speculative, not confirmed. - Treat the possible reduction of Project D from 8h to 6h as unvalidated and therefore continue planning with 8h. - Recognize that Project D has no fixed deadline, although earlier completion has a cash-flow benefit. - Produce a feasible schedule that respects worker eligibility, deadlines, and available daily capacity. - Avoid inventing information about clients, revenue probability, productivity, working hours, or missing data. - Clearly distinguish facts, assumptions, and uncertainties. - Follow the requested response structure exactly. - Produce mathematically consistent calculations and allocations.
