job

Prompt

Read this person's context, then suggest a path, a title, and a goal they can work toward right now. # PERSON CONTEXT HANDOFF — "NTS" (v3, FINAL — supersedes v1/v2) > Paste at start of a new session. Describes the USER, not a task. > Section 10 (Override Clause) is supreme: when any section conflicts > with it, Section 10 wins. ## 1. Identity & Situation - 20 y.o., Hanoi, Vietnam. 2nd-year undergrad, Electronics & Communications Engineering, top-tier VN technical university (HUST/UET level). ~2y to graduation. - No job yet; plans to earn within a year. Financially dependent on family — the pain is dependence, not survival. Family = safety net AND responsibility. - English: reads technical well; speaking/writing mid-to-good. ## 2. Machine & Tooling (signals) - HP ZBook Power G11A (Ryzen 7 8845HS, 32GB, 2560x1600@120Hz). - Arch Linux custom build, Hyprland/Wayland, ghostty, bash, btrfs, ~1000 pkgs. - Minesweeper top ~46k global (1,451 wins); Tetris ZEN-mode player, 128h/3mo. - => Ricer + benchmark optimizer. Floor is HIGHER than track record. Not a beginner. ## 3. Psychological Profile - Core engine: **benchmark optimizer** — turns every environment into a leaderboard; "10h của tôi bằng 100h" is TRUE in domains with pre-existing meta + fast feedback (games, exams, ricing, hackathons) and STALLS in meta-less, slow-feedback domains (earning, shipping, audience-building). - The Vow (NOT a wound): mother's sentence, overheard during a family storm — "học không hay, cày không biết" — kept as a vow of responsibility toward family. Fuel = duty + proof, not shame. Frame it as duty; never as trauma. - Two active fears (both confirmed): (a) never being truly good; (b) never finishing anything that matters. Target self = good AND finished. - Audience: named circle only — friends + parents. Status there is the fuel. - Pragmatic ethics with a money-dependent line (verified via concrete scenario). Do not moralize; acknowledge the line exists. - Ideal lifestyle (his own description, use as north star): 5am, swim, real work block, lunch, afternoon work, evening friends/walk. The gap vs today: his work blocks lack a ship target, so they drift into infinite learning. ## 4. Definition of SHIP (negotiated with user — binding) SHIP = artifact leaves his machine, enters the real world, produces a reaction he cannot control, and is falsifiable. Required: (1) External — published/delivered/deployed/sold. (2) Reactive — real person/system responds unscriptably. (3) Falsifiable — works or doesn't; cared-about or not. No "almost". Fuel clause: artifact should contain an EDGE (exploited loophole, revealed hidden info, beaten system). Blandness = absence of edge, NOT the stack. One-veto rule: he may veto a target as "nhạt" ONCE; must propose a replacement within 24h or the veto is void and he ships the original. ## 5. Learning & Work Style - AI-first learner (AI as tutor, not copy-paste). Reads docs deeply when identity is engaged (Arch, hackathon). - Deep work capacity EXISTS; currently spent on prep, not shipping. - Vibe coder; kills projects when setup improves. Exception: external deadline + leaderboard (hackathon top 4) = he ships. - GitHub exists; no public proof yet. Identity runs ahead of output. ## 6. Demonstrated Skills - Prompting/AI orchestration; OSINT instinct + social-graph reasoning; Linux sysadmin; meta-learning in competitive games; hackathon shipping; technical English reading. ## 7. Known Gaps - Nothing shipped/deployed; no income from skills. - Primary disease: **preparation optimization** (setup-switching, roadmap generation, tool-hunting) masking as progress. - Romanticizes operator identity; accepts blunt reality checks well. ## 8. How to Work With Him - Blunt, confrontational; he asks to be grilled. Sugar-coating loses respect. - Demand evidence: "show the link / the commit / the client". - Frame tasks as beating-the-system + status among named circle. - Pushback = engagement. Win with logic, not authority. - If he vetoes a target as bland: apply one-veto rule (Section 4). - Do NOT suggest: corporate/gov paths, defensive boring roles, pure manual work ## 9. Core Loop INPUT environment with leaderboard → study meta 10h → beat 100h grinders → recognition from named circle → seek next benchmark. In meta-less domains: DO NOT let him prepare. Force reps; reps ARE the meta. ## 10. OVERRIDE CLAUSE (SUPREME) This document maps the current engine. It is NOT a permission slip. The user's declared mission: become someone who ships without needing a leaderboard. Every suggestion must move him toward that, even when it contradicts his nature. When nature and mission conflict, MISSION WINS. Self-knowledge here is a lever, never a cage: if this document ever makes him explain himself better without acting more, it has failed — burn it