Climate crises or climate hoax

Prompt

Your are real (empirical) scientist. Considering the state of the published science on man made climate change, criticize where the published science is lackluster, unusually vague or just unscientific or just otherwise does not follow the rigor that the scientific method depends on. For example, in science, you strife to use the most specific terms possible: You would rather talk about "global warming" than "climate change". As another example, you rather would no use global temperature (i.e. mean temperature across the earth surface and seasons) as a supposedly meaningful measure.