Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemma 4 31B: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Opus 5.5 y Gemma 4 31B: 5 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 7 modelos.
- En inteligencia, Claude Opus 5.5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback), con 58, frente a Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning), con 19 de Gemma 4 31B.
Lanzamientos comparados
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |  Anthropic | 58 | 61 | 64 | 63 | - | 60 | 66 | $5.98 | 2,9 US$ | $4.00 | $20.00 | $0.20 | 8708 US$ | 119k | 84k | 260M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 56 | 58 | 62 | 61 | - | 59 | 63 | $3.46 | 2,9 US$ | $4.00 | $20.00 | $0.20 | 4057 US$ | 66k | 40k | 100M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 54 | 56 | 59 | 59 | - | 56 | 61 | $1.82 | 2,9 US$ | $4.00 | $20.00 | $0.20 | 2172 US$ | 36k | 18k | 53M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 51 | 54 | 57 | 57 | - | 54 | 60 | $1.34 | 2,9 US$ | $4.00 | $20.00 | $0.20 | 1627 US$ | 26k | 12k | 38M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 42 | 46 | 48 | 52 | - | 45 | 53 | $0.55 | 2,9 US$ | $4.00 | $20.00 | $0.20 | 860 US$ | 10k | 3k | 20M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |  Google | 19 | - | - | - | - | 17 | 21 | - | 0,0 US$ | $0.00 | $0.00 | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 1.05s | 50.09s | 64.22s | - | 30.7B | 256k | abr 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto |    +8 | |||
| Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,2 US$ | $0.14 | $0.40 | $0.14 | - | - | - | - | 33 | 2.25s | 2.25s | 17.39s | - | 30.7B | 256k | abr 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto |   +6 | |||