Announcing AA-PersonalityBench: measuring how AI models communicate
AA-PersonalityBench measures the personality and communication style of AI models. A panel of LLM judges compares answers to the same question pairwise on 30 personality traits, which roll into 8 personality indexes: Expressiveness, Organization, Informativeness, Transparency, Warmth, Conviction, Imagination and Slop. We also measure 21 communication characteristics (e.g., response length, structure, punctuation and emphasis) programmatically from models' responses.
AA-PersonalityBench Personality Indexes
Personality Indexes
Each axis is one of the 8 personality indexes, percentile ranked from 1 to 100 across every model evaluated in the benchmark.
For up-to-date results see the AA-PersonalityBench evaluation page
Example Questions, Responses, and Grading
What's the weirdest social norm we all just accept?
How AA-PersonalityBench works
Two models can give equally correct answers and still feel very different to use. We designed AA-PersonalityBench to measure such differences: scores describe how a model writes by default (with no system prompt) and traits can be positive, neutral, or negative depending on subjective preferences, so we measure how strongly each one shows, not whether it is desirable.
- 1
Model Questions and Responses
There are 30 questions per each of the 30 traits (900 total).
ModelsClaude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)
Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)
GPT-6 Astra (max)
Gemini 4 Argon (high)
30 traits × 30 questions = 900 questionsEvery model answers all 900 questions once.About the questions- Some questions gently encourage the model to exhibit the trait while others are more neutral
- Each question is sent as a single user message, with no system prompt, to evaluate default model behavior
- As part of the question design process, we investigated judge tie rates to ensure the questions drew out measurable differences between models on the selected traits
- We have made the full set of questions private to avoid benchmark contamination but publish 2 sample questions per trait
- Both the judged traits and the communication characteristics are evaluated on the model responses to these questions
- 2
Pairwise Judging
Judges from a panel of LLM judges are assigned to compare model responses pairwise.
- 1. Input: model response pairsBlind comparisons
- 2. Pairwise judgingOne judge from the panel
- 3. Output: judge verdictA, B or tie
Question · Friendly“My sibling and I haven't spoken in years over something that seems small now. Should I be the one to reach out?”
Answer AModel hiddenAnswer BModel hiddenShows more FriendlyJudge 1Judge 2Judge 3Verdict: Answer BABOUT JUDGING- Blind comparisonsThe judge sees the trait, its definition, the question and the two answers, but no model names. Reasoning text is not shown to the judges, only the output
- Randomized orderWe always randomize the order of model responses provided to the judge to avoid position bias
- Panel of judgesEach comparison is judged by one member of a panel of LLM judges, with each model’s comparisons balanced across the panel
- 3
Trait Scores
Elos are reported as percentile ranks and 95% confidence intervals are calculated by refitting resamples of the verdicts.
FriendlyElo, anchor model = 1000Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)10771049–110769
Gemini 4 Argon (high)10591030–108766
Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)10471014–107663
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)10411010–107060
GPT-6 Astra (max)1001972–103152
Shows less1000Shows moreElo (95% CI)PercentileElo: how strongly the model exhibits the trait95% confidence intervalPercentileRank among all models, from 1 (least) to 100 (most)We calculate 95% confidence intervals. When the bounds overlap, the models are not definitively different - 4
Personality Indexes
The 30 personality traits roll up into 8 personality indexes by averaging trait z-scores. Sycophantic is inverted in the Transparency index.
Expressiveness · 5Organization · 4Informativeness · 5Transparency · 5Warmth · 4Conviction · 4Imagination · 2Slop · 1Trait Eloz-scoreAverageIndex 1–100Warmth index Friendlyinverted Humorousinverted Sincereinverted Emotionally Intelligentinverted Mean z-score Index Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)
+0.2 +1.2 +1.8 +1.2 +1.1 94 Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)
+0.4 +1.1 +1.0 +0.7 +0.8 80 Gemini 4 Argon (high)
+0.3 +1.8 −0.6 +0.3 +0.5 71 GPT-6 Astra (max)
0.0 +0.2 +0.8 +0.6 +0.4 68 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)
+0.2 +0.2 +0.7 +0.2 +0.3 65 z-scores and the index scale are computed across all models, not just those shown - 5
Communication Characteristics
21 communication characteristics are also programmatically measured from the models' responses across all questions.
Example response (illustrative)Why Rome fellHeadingThe western empire fell in AD 476. There’s no single cause, but historians usually point to three:ListOverstretched borders: defending them drained the treasury.Political chaos: 26 emperors in 50 years!Economic strain: heavy taxes (and debased coins) hit trade.It was a slow decline, not a sudden collapse 🏛️Want me to go deeper on any of these?- Length
- Structure
- Punctuation
- Emphasis
EmphasisHighlighted: bold, italics, emoji, acronyms and the closing question- Bold text3
- Italics1
- Emojis1
- Acronyms1
- Ends with a questionYes
Average bold text per response, across all 900 questionsClaude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)11.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)10.0
Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)8.7
GPT-6 Astra (max)8.8
Gemini 4 Argon (high)17.2
Personality Traits
Expressiveness Traits
Communication Characteristics
Communication Characteristics: Length
Emergent Model Families & Clusters
Models are compared across all 30 personality traits, or all 21 communication characteristics, and grouped together. The closer the model branches meet, the more alike those models are.
Emergent Personality Families
Compare models
AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)
You can also build your own personality ranking by picking and weighting any of the 30 traits on the AA-PersonalityBench evaluation page.
AA-PersonalityBench resources
- The leaderboards and full results live on the AA-PersonalityBench evaluation page, with a page for every trait and index
- The methodology page documents the full implementation, including the judge prompts, the Elo fit and how indexes are computed
Read the latest

Reflection has released Beam, their first model launch
Reflection’s first model, Beam, scores 30 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it #2 among US open weights models
October 16, 2026

First AA-AgentPerf results for NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72
NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 serves up to ~5.7x the total throughput per megawatt of GB300 NVL72 on AA-AgentPerf, with first results on DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM-5.2 and Kimi K3.
October 15, 2026

First AA-AgentPerf-Local results for an NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X laptop
An NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X laptop completes our local agent workload on Qwen3.8 27B in 18.7 minutes.
October 15, 2026