Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 与 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 对比
从智能、价格、速度、上下文窗口等方面比较 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 与 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)。
如需了解我们的方法论,请参阅方法论页面。
亮点
模型比较
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 30 | 34 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 比 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 更智能 |
| 每 100 万 Token 价格 | $0.90 | $0.90 | Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 与 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 的价格相同 |
| 输出速度 | 57 token/秒 | 70 token/秒 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 比 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 更快 |
| 首 Token 延迟 | 3.72 秒 | 2.37 秒 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 比 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 响应更快 |
| 上下文窗口 | 262k token约 393 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体) | 262k token约 393 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体) | Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 与 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 的上下文窗口大小相同 |
| 发布日期 | 2026年4月 | 2026年2月 | Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 的发布日期晚于 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) |
| 参数量 | 27.8B | 总计 397B,推理时启用 17B | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 的参数量比 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 更多 |
| 推理 | 否 | 是 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 具备推理能力,而 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 不具备 |
| 图像输入支持 | 是 | 是 | Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 与 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 都支持图像输入 |
| 开放权重 | Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 与 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 都是开放权重模型 | ||
| 许可证 | |||
| 许可证允许不受限制地商用 | 是 | 是 | Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 与 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 的许可证都允许不受限制地商用 |
智能
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
开放性指数
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index 比较
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token 使用量
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
成本
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
上下文窗口
Context Window
速度
按输出速度(每秒 token 数)衡量
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
延迟
按首 Token 延迟(秒)衡量
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
端到端响应时间
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
模型规模(仅开放权重模型)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
常见问题
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 更智能。在 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 上,Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 的得分为 34,而 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 的得分为 30。
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 更快。Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 每秒生成 70.3 个 token,而 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 每秒生成 56.9 个 token。
两个模型每 100 万 token 的成本均为 $0.90(缓存命中/输入/输出比例为 7:2:1)。
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 的延迟更低。Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 的首 Token 延迟为 2.37 秒,而 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 为 3.72 秒。
两个模型的上下文窗口均为 260k 个 token。