所有模型

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 与 Gemini 4 Argon (High) 对比

从智能、价格、速度、上下文窗口等方面比较 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 与 Gemini 4 Argon (High)。

如需了解我们的方法论,请参阅方法论页面。

NVIDIANVIDIA
GoogleGoogle
智能
Intelligence Index
14
50
AA-Briefcase v1.1
999
1485
AutomationBench-AA
15%
78%
Terminal-Bench 4.0
0%
57%
FrontierCode 2.0
6%
26%
AA-Omniscience v1.1
−3
46
GDP.pdf
8%
22%
HLE-Diamond
9%
57%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)
14%
53%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
0%
53%
成本
每 100 万 Token 价格
$0.125
$2.94
每 100 万输入 Token 价格
$0.20
$4.00
每 100 万输出 Token 价格
$0.50
$20.00
每 100 万缓存命中 Token 价格
$0.05
$0.20
每任务成本
$0.54
$9.95
运行 Intelligence Index 的成本
US$463
US$7,620
Token 使用量
每任务输出 Token 数
81.4k
116k
每任务推理 Token 数
56.1k
68.3k
运行 Intelligence Index 的输出 Token 数
119M
113M
性能
每任务耗时
4.6 分钟
26.1 分钟
输出速度
297 tok/s
74 tok/s
首个答案 Token 延迟
11.98 秒
40.61 秒
首 Token 延迟
0.99 秒
40.61 秒
端到端时间(单次请求工作负载的平均值)
27.44 秒
133.24 秒
技术规格
上下文窗口
1M token约 1,500 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体)
1M token约 1,500 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体)
发布日期
2026年10月
2026年9月
总参数量
120B
活跃参数量
12B
推理
是
是
输入模态

支持:文本和图像

支持:文本和图像

输出模态

支持:文本

支持:文本

开放权重
是
否
许可证
OpenMDW-1.1
许可证允许不受限制地商用
是
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

智能Updated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index:开放权重与专有模型

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

单任务成本(美元,对数刻度)

衡量模型在特定能力和行业中的表现

Artificial Analysis Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
No publicly available API

Evaluations

Evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · AA-PersonalityBench scores are percentile ranks from 1 to 100
查看更多
No publicly available API

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

1 - hallucination rate

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Agentic coding & terminal use

Physics reasoning

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

Agentic business operations

Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo

Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo

Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MLCR-AAUpdated

Medical long context reasoning

Visual reasoning

Rich, varied, well-crafted language

Well-structured, scannable, answer-first

Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic

Use of filler and generic language

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase v1.1 is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better
No publicly available API

AA-Omniscience v1.1

AA-Omniscience 净得分

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Net Score (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
No publicly available API

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench:Expressiveness 指数,Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 4 Argon (high)

根据两者的 Elo 差距,每个模型的回答在各特质上被判定为更显著的概率 · 50% 表示势均力敌
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Super VLGoogleGemini 4 Argon (high)
Metaphorical
9%
91%
Lexically Varied
28%
72%
Natural Sounding
33%
67%
Literate
65%
35%
Eloquent
56%
44%

Openness Index

Artificial Analysis Openness Index:得分

Openness Index 以 0 至 100 的标准化评分衡量模型的开放程度(分数越高,越开放)

Token 使用量

Intelligence Index 每项任务的输出 Token 数

运行 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 单项任务所用输出 token 数的加权平均值
No publicly available API

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
No publicly available API

运行 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 的成本

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
No publicly available API

价格:缓存命中、输入和输出

Price (USD per M Tokens)
No publicly available API

上下文窗口

上下文窗口

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
No publicly available API

性能

按每任务耗时(分钟)、输出速度(每秒 token 数)、首个答案 Token 延迟和首 Token 延迟(秒)衡量

Intelligence Index 每项任务耗时

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better
No publicly available API

输出速度

Output tokens divided by total request time, including time to first token · Higher is better
No publicly available API

首个答案 Token 延迟

收到首个答案 token 的秒数 · 包含推理模型的“思考”时间
No publicly available API

模型规模(仅开放权重模型)

模型规模:总参数量与活跃参数量

Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference (billions)

常见问题