Kimi K2.6 与 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 对比
从智能、价格、速度、上下文窗口等方面比较 Kimi K2.6 与 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)。
如需了解我们的方法论,请参阅方法论页面。
亮点
模型比较
Kimi K2.6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 44 | 36* | Kimi K2.6 比 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 更智能 |
| 每 100 万 Token 价格 | $0.70 | $2.31 | Kimi K2.6 比 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 更便宜 |
| 输出速度 | 39 token/秒 | 43 token/秒 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 比 Kimi K2.6 更快 |
| 首 Token 延迟 | 2.80 秒 | 1.45 秒 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 比 Kimi K2.6 响应更快 |
| 上下文窗口 | 256k token约 384 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体) | 1000k token约 1,500 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体) | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 的上下文窗口比 Kimi K2.6 更大 |
| 发布日期 | 2026年4月 | 2026年2月 | Kimi K2.6 的发布日期晚于 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
| 推理 | 是 | 否 | Kimi K2.6 具备推理能力,而 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 不具备 |
| 图像输入支持 | 是 | 是 | Kimi K2.6 与 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 都支持图像输入 |
| 开放权重 | 否 | Kimi K2.6 是开放权重模型,而 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 是专有模型 |
智能
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
开放性指数
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index 比较
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token 使用量
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
成本
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
上下文窗口
Context Window
速度
按输出速度(每秒 token 数)衡量
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
延迟
按首 Token 延迟(秒)衡量
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
端到端响应时间
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
模型规模(仅开放权重模型)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
常见问题
Kimi K2.6 更智能。在 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 上,Kimi K2.6 的得分为 44,而 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 的得分为 36(估算值)。
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 更快。Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 每秒生成 43.2 个 token,而 Kimi K2.6 每秒生成 38.7 个 token。
Kimi K2.6 更便宜。Kimi K2.6 每 100 万 token 的成本为 $0.70,而 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 为 $2.31(缓存命中/输入/输出比例为 7:2:1)。
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 的延迟更低。Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 的首 Token 延迟为 1.45 秒,而 Kimi K2.6 为 2.80 秒。
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 的上下文窗口更大。Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 支持 1.0M 个 token,而 Kimi K2.6 支持 260k 个 token。