Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 与 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 对比
从智能、价格、速度、上下文窗口等方面比较 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 与 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)。
如需了解我们的方法论,请参阅方法论页面。
亮点
模型比较
Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 42 | 40 | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 比 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 更智能 |
| 每 100 万 Token 价格 | $1.54 | $0.07 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 比 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 更便宜 |
| 上下文窗口 | 1000k token约 1,500 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体) | 1000k token约 1,500 页 A4 纸(12 号 Arial 字体) | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 与 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 的上下文窗口大小相同 |
| 发布日期 | 2026年6月 | 2026年4月 | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 的发布日期晚于 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) |
| 推理 | 否 | 是 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 具备推理能力,而 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 不具备 |
| 图像输入支持 | 是 | 否 | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 支持图像输入,而 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 不支持 |
| 开放权重 | 否 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 是开放权重模型,而 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 是专有模型 |
智能
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
开放性指数
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index 比较
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token 使用量
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
成本
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
上下文窗口
Context Window
速度
按输出速度(每秒 token 数)衡量
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
延迟
按首 Token 延迟(秒)衡量
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
端到端响应时间
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
模型规模(仅开放权重模型)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
常见问题
Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 更智能。在 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 上,Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 的得分为 42,而 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 的得分为 40。
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 更便宜。DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) 每 100 万 token 的成本为 $0.07,而 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) 为 $1.54(缓存命中/输入/输出比例为 7:2:1)。
两个模型的上下文窗口均为 1.0M 个 token。