This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

Anthropic has launched a newer model, Claude 4 Sonnet. We suggest considering it instead.

For more information, see comparison of Claude 4 Sonnet to other models and API provider benchmarks for Claude 4 Sonnet.

Anthropic logo
Anthropic
•
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
•

Proprietary model

•

Released fevereiro de 2025

Análise de inteligência, desempenho e preço do Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)

Benchmarks de provedores de API

Resumo do modelo

Inteligência

28
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
3 de 4 unidades para Inteligência.

Velocidade

N/D
Tokens de saída por segundo
Valor desconhecido entre 4 unidades para Velocidade.

Custo

Entrada US$ 0,00Saída US$ 0,00
N/D
Custo por tarefa do Intelligence Index
Valor desconhecido entre 4 unidades para Custo.

Verbosidade

N/D
Tokens de saída do Intelligence Index
Valor desconhecido entre 4 unidades para Verbosidade.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) está acima da média em inteligência e tem preço competitivo em comparação com outros modelos de preço semelhante. O modelo aceita entrada em texto e imagem, gera saída em texto e tem uma janela de contexto de 200k tokens, com conhecimento até outubro de 2024.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) alcança 28 pontos no Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, ficando acima da média entre os modelos comparáveis (mediana: 17).

O preço do Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) é de $0.00 por 1M de tokens de entrada (preço competitivo, mediana: $0.18) e $0.00 por 1M de tokens de saída (preço competitivo, mediana: $0.60).

RaciocínioSim

Esta página mostra a versão com raciocínio deste modelo.

Também pode existir uma variante sem raciocínio.

Modalidade de entrada

Compatível com: texto e imagem

Modalidade de saída

Compatível com: texto

Data-limite do conhecimento1 de out. de 2024
Janela de contexto200k
~300 páginas A4 em fonte Arial tamanho 12

As métricas são comparadas com modelos da mesma classe:

  • Modelos sem raciocínio → comparados apenas com outros modelos sem raciocínio
  • Modelos de raciocínio → comparados com modelos com e sem raciocínio
  • Modelos de pesos abertos → comparados apenas com outros modelos de pesos abertos da mesma classe de tamanho:
    • Muito pequeno: ≤4B parâmetros
    • Pequeno: 4B–40B parâmetros
    • Médio: 40B–150B parâmetros
    • Grande: >150B parâmetros
  • Modelos proprietários → comparados com modelos proprietários e de pesos abertos da mesma faixa de preço, usando uma proporção combinada de 3:1 entre os preços de entrada e saída:
    • <$0.15 por 1M de tokens
    • $0.15–$1 por 1M de tokens
    • >$1 por 1M de tokens

Destaques

Inteligência

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidade

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Custo por tarefa

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Inteligência

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if commercial use is limited by conditions, and as 'Non-commercial' if the license prohibits commercial use.

Avaliações

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more
GDPval-AA v2

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

𝜏³-BankingUpdated

Agentic tool use

Terminal-Bench v2.1

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last ExamUpdated

Reasoning & knowledge

GPQA Diamond

Scientific reasoning

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience AccuracyUpdated

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination RateUpdated

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCRUpdated

Long context reasoning

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

AutomationBench-AA

Agentic SaaS workflows

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Agentic business operations

AA-AnalystAgentNew

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

IFBench

Instruction following

APEX-Agents-AA

Long-horizon agentic tasks

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Comparações do Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Custo

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Janela de contexto

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Perguntas frequentes

Perguntas comuns sobre o Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)

O Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) foi lançado em 24 de fevereiro de 2025.

Anthropic criou o Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning).

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) alcança 28 pontos (estimativa) no Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, ficando acima da média entre outros modelos de raciocínio em uma faixa de preço semelhante (mediana: 17).

Sim, o Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) é um modelo de raciocínio. Ele usa reflexão prolongada ou raciocínio em cadeia para resolver problemas complexos antes de fornecer uma resposta.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) aceita entrada em texto e imagem.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) permite saída em texto.

Sim, o Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) aceita imagens como entrada e pode analisá-las, descrevê-las e responder a perguntas sobre elas.

Sim, o Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) é multimodal. Ele consegue processar entrada em texto e imagem e gerar saída em texto.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) tem uma janela de contexto de 200k tokens. Isso determina quanto texto e histórico da conversa o modelo consegue processar em uma única solicitação.

Não, o Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) é proprietário. Os pesos não estão disponíveis publicamente.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) é um modelo proprietário, e Anthropic não divulgou o tamanho nem o número de parâmetros do modelo.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) alcança 28 pontos no Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Esse benchmark composto avalia os modelos em raciocínio, conhecimento, matemática e programação.

A data-limite do conhecimento do Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) é outubro de 2024. Os dados de treinamento do modelo incluem informações até essa data.

Consulte a página de provedores para ver a disponibilidade atual por API. Ver provedores

Acesse a página de provedores para consultar a disponibilidade. Comparar provedores