Qwen3.6 27B vs Gemma 4 31B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Qwen3.6 27B and Gemma 4 31B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, Qwen3.6 27B scores highest: Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) at 22, against Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) at 15 for Gemma 4 31B.
- For output speed, Qwen3.6 27B is fastest: Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) at 58 t/s, against Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) at 50 t/s for Gemma 4 31B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench v4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) |  Alibaba | 22 | 27.8B | 262k | $0.9 | 58 |    +2 | ||
| Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) | Alibaba | 20 | 27.8B | 262k | $0.9 | 56 |  +2 | ||
| Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |  Google | 15 | 30.7B | 256k | - | 35 |   +11 | ||
| Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 14 | 30.7B | 256k | $0.2 | 50 |   +8 |