MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.6 27B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.6 27B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores highest: MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 26, against Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) at 22 for Qwen3.6 27B.
- For output speed, Qwen3.6 27B is fastest: Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) at 59 t/s, against MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 39 t/s for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- For cost per task, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheapest: MiMo-V2.5-Pro at $0.05, against Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) at $0.62 for Qwen3.6 27B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro |  Xiaomi | 26 | 28 | 21 | 30 | 26 | 29 | 41 | $0.05 | $0.2 | $0.435 | $0.87 | $0.0036 | $138 | 30k | 18k | 112M | 39 | 4.38s | 55.59s | 68.39s | 701.59s | 1.0T 42B active at inference time | 1M | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text | Supports: text |    | |||
| Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) |  Alibaba | 22 | 22 | 18 | 24 | - | 24 | 32 | $0.62 | $0.9 | $0.60 | $3.60 | - | $1,145 | 32k | 19k | 164M | 57 | 3.68s | 102.42s | 111.12s | 505.04s | 27.8B | 262k | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |  +2 | |||
| Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) | Alibaba | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.9 | $0.60 | $3.60 | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | 3.65s | 3.65s | 12.14s | - | 27.8B | 262k | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text, image, and video | Supports: text |  +2 | |||
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) | Xiaomi | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.2 | $0.435 | $0.87 | $0.0036 | - | - | - | - | 37 | 4.19s | 4.19s | 17.57s | - | 1.0T 41.7B active at inference time | 1M | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text | Supports: text | | |||