MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 397B A17B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores highest: MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 26, against Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) at 21 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
- For output speed, Qwen3.5 397B A17B is fastest: Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) at 83 t/s, against MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 38 t/s for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- For cost per task, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheapest: MiMo-V2.5-Pro at $0.05, against Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) at $0.47 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro |  Xiaomi | 26 | 28 | 21 | 30 | 26 | 29 | 41 | $0.05 | $0.2 | $0.435 | $0.87 | $0.0036 | $138 | 30k | 18k | 112M | 38 | 4.36s | 56.38s | 69.38s | 682.62s | 1.0T 42B active at inference time | 1M | Apr 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text | Supports: text |    | |||
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) |  Alibaba | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.9 | $0.60 | $3.60 | - | - | - | - | - | 81 | 2.16s | 2.16s | 8.35s | - | 397B 17B active at inference time | 262k | Feb 2026 | - | No | Supports: text and image | Supports: text |  +3 | |||
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Alibaba | 19 | 20 | 16 | 22 | - | 22 | 28 | $0.47 | $0.9 | $0.60 | $3.60 | - | $941 | 19k | 9k | 95M | 83 | 2.17s | 40.55s | 46.58s | 212.22s | 397B 17B active at inference time | 262k | Feb 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text |  +6 | |||
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) | Xiaomi | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.2 | $0.435 | $0.87 | $0.0036 | - | - | - | - | 35 | 4.19s | 4.19s | 18.53s | - | 1.0T 41.7B active at inference time | 1M | Apr 2026 | - | No | Supports: text | Supports: text | | |||