MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Gemma 4 31B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Gemma 4 31B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores highest: MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 26, against Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) at 15 for Gemma 4 31B.
- For output speed, Gemma 4 31B is fastest: Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) at 50 t/s, against MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) at 46 t/s for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench v4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 26 | 1.0T 42B active at inference time | 1M | $0.2 | 45 | ||||
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) | 18 | 1.0T 41.7B active at inference time | 1M | $0.2 | 46 | ||||
| Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) | 15 | 30.7B | 256k | - | 35 | +11 | |||
| Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | 14 | 30.7B | 256k | $0.2 | 50 | +8 |