Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2-Flash: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2-Flash releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, MiMo-V2-Flash scores highest: MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) at 21, against Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) at 15 for Gemma 4 31B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench v4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) |  Xiaomi | 21 | 309B 15B active at inference time | 256k | $0.1 | - | | ||
| MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) | Xiaomi | 16 | 309B 15B active at inference time | 256k | - | - | - | ||
| Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |  Google | 15 | 30.7B | 256k | - | 35 |    +11 | ||
| Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 14 | 30.7B | 256k | $0.2 | 52 |   +8 |