Japanese: Comparison of Leading AI Models (Multilingual Reasoning Comparison)
Japanese language comparison and analysis of AI models across key performance metrics, including Japanese reasoning capabilities, cost, output speed, latency, context window, and more. To compare other languages, see our full Multilingual Reasoning Comparison.
Model Comparison Summary
Intelligence:
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct) and
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) are the highest quality models, followed by
GPT-4o (Aug '24) &
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep).Output Speed (tokens/s):
Llama 3.3 70B (134 t/s) and
Nova Pro (133 t/s) are the fastest models, followed by
o1 &
GPT-4o (Aug '24).Latency (seconds):
GPT-4o mini (0.36s) and
Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) (0.40s) are the lowest latency models, followed by
Llama 3.3 70B &
GPT-4o (Aug '24).Price ($ per M tokens):
Qwen2.5 72B ($0.00) and
GPT-4o mini ($0.26) are the cheapest models, followed by
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) &
Llama 3.3 70B.Context Window:
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep) (2m) and
Nova Pro (300k) are the largest context window models, followed by
o1 &
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct).





Highlights
Intelligence: Japanese
Multilingual Index (Japanese); Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better