This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

Google has launched a newer model, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Sep). We suggest considering it instead.

For more information, see comparison of Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Sep) to other models and API provider benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Sep).

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning) logo
Google
•

Proprietary model

•

Released June 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の知能、性能、料金の分析

APIプロバイダーのベンチマーク

モデル概要

知能

11
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
知能は4段階中2です。

速度

337.2
1秒あたりの出力トークン数
速度は4段階中4です。

料金

入力
$0.10
100万トークンあたり
出力
$0.40
100万トークンあたり
料金は4段階中1です。

キャッシュヒット料金

$0.01
100万トークンあたりのUSD
キャッシュヒット料金は4段階中1です。

冗長性

該当なし
Intelligence Indexでの出力トークン数
冗長性は4段階中不明です。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の知能は平均を下回りますが、料金は割安です。これは同程度の料金の他のモデルと比較した場合です。 このモデルはテキスト、画像、音声、動画入力に対応し、テキストを出力します。コンテキストウィンドウは1Mトークンで、知識は2025年1月までです。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)のArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexスコアは11で、同等のモデルの中では平均以下です（中央値：17）。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の料金は入力100万トークンあたり$0.10（競争力が高い、中央値：$0.25）、出力100万トークンあたり$0.40（競争力が高い、中央値：$0.89）です。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の出力速度は毎秒337トークンで、特に速い水準です（108）。

推論はい

このページでは、このモデルの推論版を表示しています。

非推論版も存在する可能性があります。

入力モダリティ

対応：テキスト、画像、音声、動画

出力モダリティ

対応：テキスト

知識のカットオフ2025/01/01
コンテキストウィンドウ1M
Arial 12ポイントのA4用紙約1500ページ分

各指標は同じクラスのモデルと比較します。

  • 非推論モデル → 他の非推論モデルとのみ比較
  • 推論モデル → 推論モデルと非推論モデルの両方と比較
  • オープンウェイトモデル → 同じ規模クラスの他のオープンウェイトモデルとのみ比較：
    • 極小：パラメーター数≤4B
    • 小：パラメーター数4B～40B
    • 中：パラメーター数40B～150B
    • 大：パラメーター数>150B
  • 独自モデル → 入力／出力のブレンド料金を3:1として、同じ料金帯の独自モデルとオープンウェイトモデルを比較：
    • 100万トークンあたり<$0.15
    • 100万トークンあたり$0.15～$1
    • 100万トークンあたり>$1

ハイライト

知能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

タスクあたりの費用

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

知能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

ベンチマーク

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
GDPval-AA v2

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

𝜏³-Banking

Agentic tool use

Terminal-Bench v2.1

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GPQA Diamond

Scientific reasoning

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR

Long context reasoning

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

AutomationBench-AA

Agentic SaaS workflows

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AANew

Agentic business operations

IFBench

Instruction following

APEX-Agents-AA

Long-horizon agentic tasks

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Intelligence Indexの比較

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

費用

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

コンテキストウィンドウ

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

速度

出力速度（1秒あたりのトークン数）で測定

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

遅延

最初のトークンまでの時間（秒）で測定

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

エンドツーエンド応答時間

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

  • Input time: Time to receive the first response token
  • Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
  • Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

よくある質問

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)に関するよくある質問

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)は2025年6月17日にリリースされました。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)はGoogleが開発しました。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)のArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexの推定スコアは11で、同程度の料金帯の他の推論モデルの中では平均以下水準です（中央値：17）。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の出力速度は毎秒337.2トークンです（GoogleのAPIに基づく）。同程度の料金帯の他の推論モデルと比べて平均を大きく上回る水準です（中央値：108.1 t/s）。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の最初のトークンまでの時間（TTFT）は25.70秒です（GoogleのAPIに基づく）。同程度の料金帯の他の推論モデルと比べて長い部類水準です（中央値：1.88秒）。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の料金は入力100万トークンあたり$0.10（非常に競争力が高い、中央値：$0.25）、出力100万トークンあたり$0.40（非常に競争力が高い、中央値：$0.89）です。GoogleのAPIに基づきます。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の料金は入力100万トークンあたり$0.10、出力100万トークンあたり$0.40です（GoogleのAPIに基づく）。キャッシュヒット／入力／出力を7:2:1とするブレンド料金は、100万トークンあたり$0.07です。料金はプロバイダーによって異なる場合があります。 プロバイダー料金を比較

はい。Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)は推論モデルです。回答前に拡張思考や思考の連鎖による推論を行い、複雑な問題に取り組みます。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)はテキスト、画像、音声、動画入力に対応しています。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)はテキスト出力に対応しています。

はい。Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)は画像入力に対応し、画像の分析、説明、画像に関する質問への回答が可能です。

はい。Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)はマルチモーダルです。テキスト、画像、音声、動画入力を処理し、テキスト出力を生成できます。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)のコンテキストウィンドウは1.0Mトークンです。これは、モデルが1回のリクエストで処理できるテキストと会話履歴の量を決定します。

いいえ。Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)は独自モデルで、モデルウェイトは一般公開されていません。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)は独自モデルであり、Googleはモデルの規模やパラメーター数を開示していません。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)のArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexスコアは11です。この複合ベンチマークでは、推論、知識、数学、コーディングについてモデルを評価します。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)の知識のカットオフは2025年1月です。モデルの学習データには、この日付までの情報が含まれます。

はい。Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)は1社のプロバイダーを通じてAPIで利用できます。 APIプロバイダーを比較

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)は1社のAPIプロバイダーを通じて利用できます。 プロバイダーを比較