Gemma 4 12B vs. Qwen3.5 9B: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos Gemma 4 12B y Qwen3.5 9B: 2 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 4 modelos.
- En inteligencia, Gemma 4 12B y Qwen3.5 9B empatan en 14 (Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) y Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)).
- En velocidad de salida, Gemma 4 12B es el más rápido: Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning), con 112 tokens/s, frente a Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning), con 88 tokens/s de Qwen3.5 9B.
Lanzamientos comparados
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) |  Google | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,1 US$ | $0.10 | $0.30 | - | - | - | - | - | 112 | 2.37s | 20.28s | 24.76s | - | 12B | 256k | jun 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto, imágenes, voz y video | Admite: texto |  | |||
| Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) |  Alibaba | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,1 US$ | $0.135 | $0.20 | - | - | - | - | - | 57 | 1.95s | 36.81s | 45.52s | - | 9.7B | 262k | mar 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto |  | |||
| Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | Alibaba | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,2 US$ | $0.17 | $0.25 | - | - | - | - | - | 88 | 0.79s | 0.79s | 6.47s | - | 9.7B | 262k | mar 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto | | |||
| Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) | Google | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,1 US$ | $0.10 | $0.30 | - | - | - | - | - | 110 | 2.34s | 2.34s | 6.89s | - | 12B | 262k | jun 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto, imágenes, voz y video | Admite: texto | | |||