DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs. Qwen3.5 9B: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 y Qwen3.5 9B: 2 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 4 modelos.
- En inteligencia, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 obtiene la puntuación más alta: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort), con 36, frente a Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning), con 13 de Qwen3.5 9B.
- En velocidad de salida, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 es el más rápido: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning), con 211 tokens/s, frente a Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning), con 36 tokens/s de Qwen3.5 9B.
- En costo por tarea, Qwen3.5 9B es el más económico: Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning), con $0.21, frente a DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning), con $0.48 de DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) |  DeepSeek | 36 | 41 | 46 | 41 | 38 | 37 | 44 | $0.67 | 0,7 US$ | $1.32 | $3.96 | $0.044 | 1122 US$ | 55k | 38k | 163M | 81 | 1.67s | 26.35s | 32.52s | 540.27s | 1.6T 49B activos en inferencia | 1M | ago 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto | Admite: texto |   +8 | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | DeepSeek | 20 | 26 | 32 | 27 | - | 22 | 26 | $0.48 | 0,7 US$ | $1.32 | $3.96 | $0.044 | 566 US$ | 29k | 0 | 40M | 211 | 2.18s | 2.18s | 4.54s | 137.84s | 1.6T 49B activos en inferencia | 1M | ago 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto | Admite: texto |   | |||
| Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) |  Alibaba | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,2 US$ | $0.17 | $0.25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9.7B | 262k | mar 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto |  | |||
| Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Alibaba | 11 | 10 | 7 | 11 | - | 14 | 16 | $0.21 | 0,1 US$ | $0.135 | $0.20 | - | 329 US$ | 35k | 20k | 215M | 36 | 2.45s | 58.20s | 72.13s | 804.38s | 9.7B | 262k | mar 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto | | |||