Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) logo
Anthropic
•

Proprietary model

•

Released June 2026

Análisis de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio de Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Benchmarks de proveedores de API

Resumen del modelo

Inteligencia

42
Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis
4 de 4 unidades para Inteligencia.

Velocidad

64.3
Tokens de salida por segundo
3 de 4 unidades para Velocidad.

Precio

Entrada
2,00 US$
por 1 M de tokens
Salida
10,00 US$
por 1 M de tokens
2 de 4 unidades para Precio.

Precio de caché

Escritura
2,50 US$
por 1 M de tokens
Acierto
0,20 US$
por 1 M de tokens
2 de 4 unidades para Precio de caché.

Verbosidad

14M
Tokens de salida del Índice de Inteligencia
3 de 4 unidades para Verbosidad.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) está entre los modelos líderes en inteligencia y tiene un precio razonable en comparación con otros modelos sin razonamiento y de precio similar. También es más rápido que el promedio; sin embargo, es algo verboso. El modelo admite entrada de texto e imágenes, genera texto y tiene una ventana de contexto de 1M tokens.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) obtiene 42 puntos en el Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis, lo que lo sitúa muy por encima del promedio entre modelos comparables (con una mediana de 19). Al evaluar el Índice de Inteligencia, generó 14M tokens, lo que es algo verboso frente a la mediana de 5.3M.

El precio de Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) es de $2.00 por 1 M de tokens de entrada (moderado; mediana: $2.00) y $10.00 por 1 M de tokens de salida (algo elevado; mediana: $8.00). En total, evaluar Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) en el Índice de Inteligencia costó $427.33.

Con 64 tokens por segundo, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) es más rápido que el promedio (58).

RazonamientoNo

Esta página muestra la versión sin razonamiento de este modelo.

También puede existir una variante con razonamiento.

Modalidad de entrada

Admite: texto e imágenes

Modalidad de salida

Admite: texto

Ventana de contexto1M
~1500 páginas A4 con fuente Arial de 12 puntos

Las métricas se comparan con modelos de la misma clase:

  • Modelos sin razonamiento → se comparan solo con otros modelos sin razonamiento
  • Modelos de razonamiento → se comparan tanto con modelos de razonamiento como sin razonamiento
  • Modelos de pesos abiertos → se comparan solo con otros modelos de pesos abiertos de la misma categoría de tamaño:
    • Muy pequeño: ≤4B parámetros
    • Pequeño: 4B–40B parámetros
    • Mediano: 40B–150B parámetros
    • Grande: >150B parámetros
  • Modelos propietarios → se comparan con modelos propietarios y de pesos abiertos del mismo rango de precio mediante una proporción combinada de precios de entrada/salida de 3:1:
    • <$0.15 por 1 M de tokens
    • $0.15–$1 por 1 M de tokens
    • >$1 por 1 M de tokens

Aspectos destacados

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidad

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

Benchmarks

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
GDPval-AA v2

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

𝜏³-Banking

Agentic tool use

Terminal-Bench v2.1

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GPQA Diamond

Scientific reasoning

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR

Long context reasoning

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

AutomationBench-AA

Agentic SaaS workflows

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AANew

Agentic business operations

IFBench

Instruction following

APEX-Agents-AA

Long-horizon agentic tasks

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Comparaciones del Índice de Inteligencia

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Uso de tokens

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

Costo

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Price per token included in the request/message sent to the API, represented as USD per million Tokens.

The blended cache price shown here uses cache hit price only. Other caching costs differ by provider:

  • Anthropic: charges a separate cache write fee, with different rates for 5-minute and 1-hour TTLs (1-hour TTL is more expensive).
  • Google (Vertex/Gemini): charges a per-hour cache storage fee in addition to cache hit pricing. Some providers also use tiered pricing for prompts above 200K tokens.
  • OpenAI, DeepSeek, others: typically charge only cache hit pricing with no write or storage fee.

See Prompt Caching for the full breakdown.

Price per token generated by the model (received from the API), represented as USD per million Tokens.

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Ventana de contexto

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Velocidad

Medida por la velocidad de salida (tokens por segundo)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

Latencia

Medida por el tiempo (segundos) hasta el primer token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

Tiempo de respuesta de extremo a extremo

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

  • Input time: Time to receive the first response token
  • Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
  • Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Preguntas frecuentes

Preguntas comunes sobre Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) se lanzó el 30 de junio de 2026.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) fue creado por Anthropic.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) obtiene 42 puntos en el Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis, lo que lo sitúa muy por encima del promedio entre otros modelos sin razonamiento en un rango de precio similar (mediana: 19).

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) genera 64.3 tokens de salida por segundo (según la API de Anthropic), un valor por encima del promedio frente a otros modelos sin razonamiento en un rango de precio similar (mediana: 58.4 t/s).

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) tiene un tiempo hasta el primer token (TTFT) de 1.64 s (según la API de Anthropic), un valor mejor que el promedio frente a otros modelos sin razonamiento en un rango de precio similar (mediana: 1.64 s).

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) cuesta $2.00 por 1 M de tokens de entrada (mejor que el promedio; mediana: $2.00) y $10.00 por 1 M de tokens de salida (algo mayor que el promedio; mediana: $8.00), según la API de Anthropic.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) cuesta $2.00 por 1 M de tokens de entrada y $10.00 por 1 M de tokens de salida (según la API de Anthropic). Con una tarifa combinada (proporción 7:2:1 entre aciertos de caché, entrada y salida), equivale a $1.54 por 1 M de tokens. El precio puede variar según el proveedor. Comparar precios de proveedores

Al evaluarlo en el Índice de Inteligencia, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) generó 14M tokens de salida, un valor algo mayor que el promedio frente a otros modelos sin razonamiento en un rango de precio similar (mediana: 5.3M).

No, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) no es un modelo de razonamiento. Responde directamente sin razonamiento extendido en cadena.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) admite entrada de texto e imágenes.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) admite salida de texto.

Sí, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) admite imágenes como entrada y puede analizarlas, describirlas y responder preguntas sobre ellas.

Sí, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) es multimodal. Puede procesar entradas de texto e imágenes y generar salidas de texto.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) tiene una ventana de contexto de 1.0M tokens. Esto determina cuánto texto e historial de conversación puede procesar el modelo en una sola solicitud.

No, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) es propietario. Los pesos del modelo no están disponibles públicamente.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) es un modelo propietario y Anthropic no ha revelado su tamaño ni su cantidad de parámetros.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) obtiene 42 puntos en el Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis. Este benchmark compuesto evalúa los modelos en razonamiento, conocimiento, matemáticas y programación.

Sí, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) está disponible mediante API a través de 3 proveedores. Comparar proveedores de API

Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) está disponible a través de 3 proveedores de API. Comparar proveedores