This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

Anthropic has launched a newer model, Claude 3.5 Haiku. We suggest considering it instead.

For more information, see comparison of Claude 3.5 Haiku to other models and API provider benchmarks for Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku logo

Proprietary model

Released March 2024

Análisis de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio de Claude 3 Haiku

Resumen del modelo

Inteligencia

4
Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis
1 de 4 unidades para Inteligencia.

Velocidad

N/D
Tokens de salida por segundo
Valor desconocido de 4 unidades para Velocidad.

Precio de entrada

0,25 US$
USD por 1 M de tokens
2 de 4 unidades para Precio de entrada.

Precio de salida

1,25 US$
USD por 1 M de tokens
3 de 4 unidades para Precio de salida.

Verbosidad

N/D
Tokens de salida del Índice de Inteligencia
Valor desconocido de 4 unidades para Verbosidad.

Claude 3 Haiku está entre los modelos menos inteligentes y tiene un precio algo elevado en comparación con otros modelos sin razonamiento y de precio similar. El modelo admite entrada de texto e imágenes, genera texto y tiene una ventana de contexto de 200k tokens con conocimientos hasta agosto de 2023.

Claude 3 Haiku obtiene 4 puntos en el Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis, lo que lo sitúa en el extremo inferior entre modelos comparables (con una mediana de 11).

El precio de Claude 3 Haiku es de $0.25 por 1 M de tokens de entrada (moderado; mediana: $0.25) y $1.25 por 1 M de tokens de salida (algo elevado; mediana: $0.76).

RazonamientoNo

Esta página muestra la versión sin razonamiento de este modelo.

También puede existir una variante con razonamiento.

Modalidad de entrada

Admite: texto e imágenes

Modalidad de salida

Admite: texto

Fecha límite de conocimiento1 ago 2023
Ventana de contexto200k
~300 páginas A4 con fuente Arial de 12 puntos

Las métricas se comparan con modelos de la misma clase:

  • Modelos sin razonamiento → se comparan solo con otros modelos sin razonamiento
  • Modelos de razonamiento → se comparan tanto con modelos de razonamiento como sin razonamiento
  • Modelos de pesos abiertos → se comparan solo con otros modelos de pesos abiertos de la misma categoría de tamaño:
    • Muy pequeño: ≤4B parámetros
    • Pequeño: 4B–40B parámetros
    • Mediano: 40B–150B parámetros
    • Grande: >150B parámetros
  • Modelos propietarios → se comparan con modelos propietarios y de pesos abiertos del mismo rango de precio mediante una proporción combinada de precios de entrada/salida de 3:1:
    • <$0.15 por 1 M de tokens
    • $0.15–$1 por 1 M de tokens
    • >$1 por 1 M de tokens

Aspectos destacados

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidad

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Scientific reasoning

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Comparaciones del Índice de Inteligencia

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Costo

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Price per token included in the request/message sent to the API, represented as USD per million Tokens.

The blended cache price shown here uses cache hit price only. Other caching costs differ by provider:

  • Anthropic: charges a separate cache write fee, with different rates for 5-minute and 1-hour TTLs (1-hour TTL is more expensive).
  • Google (Vertex/Gemini): charges a per-hour cache storage fee in addition to cache hit pricing. Some providers also use tiered pricing for prompts above 200K tokens.
  • OpenAI, DeepSeek, others: typically charge only cache hit pricing with no write or storage fee.

See Prompt Caching for the full breakdown.

Price per token generated by the model (received from the API), represented as USD per million Tokens.

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Ventana de contexto

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Preguntas frecuentes

Preguntas comunes sobre Claude 3 Haiku

Claude 3 Haiku se lanzó el 4 de marzo de 2024.

Claude 3 Haiku fue creado por Anthropic.

Claude 3 Haiku obtiene 4 puntos (estimados) en el Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis, lo que lo sitúa en el extremo inferior entre otros modelos sin razonamiento en un rango de precio similar (mediana: 11).

Claude 3 Haiku cuesta $0.25 por 1 M de tokens de entrada (mejor que el promedio; mediana: $0.25) y $1.25 por 1 M de tokens de salida (algo mayor que el promedio; mediana: $0.76), según la mediana de los proveedores que sirven el modelo.

Claude 3 Haiku cuesta $0.25 por 1 M de tokens de entrada y $1.25 por 1 M de tokens de salida (según la mediana de los proveedores que sirven el modelo). Con una tarifa combinada (proporción 7:2:1 entre aciertos de caché, entrada y salida), equivale a $0.35 por 1 M de tokens. El precio puede variar según el proveedor. Comparar precios de proveedores

No, Claude 3 Haiku no es un modelo de razonamiento. Responde directamente sin razonamiento extendido en cadena.

Claude 3 Haiku admite entrada de texto e imágenes.

Claude 3 Haiku admite salida de texto.

Sí, Claude 3 Haiku admite imágenes como entrada y puede analizarlas, describirlas y responder preguntas sobre ellas.

Sí, Claude 3 Haiku es multimodal. Puede procesar entradas de texto e imágenes y generar salidas de texto.

Claude 3 Haiku tiene una ventana de contexto de 200k tokens. Esto determina cuánto texto e historial de conversación puede procesar el modelo en una sola solicitud.

No, Claude 3 Haiku es propietario. Los pesos del modelo no están disponibles públicamente.

Claude 3 Haiku es un modelo propietario y Anthropic no ha revelado su tamaño ni su cantidad de parámetros.

Claude 3 Haiku obtiene 4 puntos en el Índice de Inteligencia de Artificial Analysis. Este benchmark compuesto evalúa los modelos en razonamiento, conocimiento, matemáticas y programación.

La fecha límite de conocimiento de Claude 3 Haiku es agosto de 2023. Sus datos de entrenamiento incluyen información hasta esa fecha.

Sí, Claude 3 Haiku está disponible mediante API a través de 1 proveedor. Comparar proveedores de API

Claude 3 Haiku está disponible a través de 1 proveedor de API. Comparar proveedores