所有发布••

Proprietary release

•

Released 2026年11月

Muse Ember:本次发布的智能、性能与价格

可用服务商

模型摘要

智能Updated

36
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
智能为 4 档中的第 4 档。
无
每个 Intelligence Index 任务耗时(分钟)
性能在 4 档中的档位未知。

成本

输入 $0.10输出 $0.50缓存折扣 96%
$0.14
Intelligence Index 每项任务的成本
成本为 4 档中的第 2 档。

冗长度

输入 Token 10B输出/输入 1.147%
115M
Intelligence Index 输出 token 数
冗长度为 4 档中的第 3 档。

Muse Ember 发布包含 2 个模型,各自具有不同的智能、性能与价格特征。下方对这 2 个模型的关键指标进行了比较。

  • 智能方面,Muse Ember 中得分最高的模型是 Muse Ember (Max)(36)。
  • 价格方面,Muse Ember (Xhigh)($0.12) 的单任务成本最低。不同模型的价格差异最高可达 1.2 倍。

Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
No publicly available API
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
No publicly available API
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
No publicly available API

智能Updated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Muse Ember
Pareto line

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

速度与延迟

Intelligence Index 每项任务耗时

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better

能力得分

能力指数

衡量模型在特定能力与行业中的表现
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
查看更多

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

1 - hallucination rate

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Agentic coding & terminal use

Physics reasoning

Meta 的更多发布

更多详情

权重
服务商基准测试
Muse Ember (Max)
Meta 标志Meta
36
-
1M
$0.0728
-
-
不可用
Meta
Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Meta 标志Meta
34
-
1M
$0.0728
-
-
不可用
Meta