Grok 4.7 vs. Claude Fable 5.1：发布比较

Grok 4.7 与 Claude Fable 5.1 发布比较：分别包含 3 个和 5 个模型，各自具有不同的智能、性能与价格特征。下方对全部 8 个模型的关键指标进行了比较。

智能方面，Claude Fable 5.1 得分最高：Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)（53），Grok 4.7 为 Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)（46）。
输出速度方面，Grok 4.7 最快：Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)（83 token/秒），Claude Fable 5.1 为 Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)（65 token/秒）。
单任务成本方面，Grok 4.7 最低：Grok 4.7 (Low)（$1.25），Claude Fable 5.1 为 Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)（$2.37）。

比较的发布


	Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (high with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (medium with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (low with fallback)	Grok 4.7 (xhigh)	Grok 4.7 (high)	Grok 4.7 (low)
Intelligence Index	53	53	51	49	47	46	46	42
财务与会计	56	56	54	51	49	52	52	48
战略与运营	60	58	56	54	51	54	54	51
法律	60	61	58	57	53	54	54	51
医疗与健康	58	--	--	--	--	47	--	--
工程	56	57	54	51	49	47	47	42
经济学	63	62	60	58	55	56	55	53
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1675	1656	1581	1528	1482	1644	1634	1499
GDPval-AA v2.1	1756	1733	1633	1545	1468	1712	1708	1588
AutomationBench-AA	59.4%	57.8%	55.3%	54.7%	52.2%	65.6%	63.5%	56.7%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	52.0%	55.1%	52.0%	44.9%	40.4%	25.8%	24.7%	16.2%
SciCode	63.1%	60.9%	58.7%	56.4%	56.7%	57.4%	57.8%	54.9%
Humanity's Last Exam	59.1%	58.7%	55.9%	53.8%	48.9%	43.1%	42.3%	39.2%
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.2%	26.8%	26.8%	28.0%	20.0%	23.2%	21.4%
CritPt	29.7%	31.1%	30.3%	29.1%	27.7%	17.7%	18.0%	13.4%
AA-Omniscience	43	42	41	38	34	32	31	30
AA-LCR v1.1	85.3%	83.0%	83.7%	84.7%	82.3%	76.7%	77.0%	80.0%

每任务成本美元	$7.63	$5.98	$3.91	$2.98	$2.37	$3.74	$2.73	$1.25
输入价格美元/100 万 Token	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00
输出价格美元/100 万 Token	$50.00	$50.00	$50.00	$50.00	$50.00	$6.00	$6.00	$6.00
缓存命中价格美元/100 万 Token	$0.25	$0.25	$0.25	$0.25	$0.25	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50
缓存写入价格美元/100 万 Token	$12.50	$12.50	$12.50	$12.50	$12.50	--	--	--

输出速度Token/秒	65	62	58	57	58	83	79	77
首 Token 延迟秒	249.70	106.04	19.94	6.69	2.37	88.14	46.44	5.93
首个回答 Token 时间秒	249.70	106.04	19.94	6.69	2.37	88.14	46.44	5.93
端到端响应时间秒	257.36	114.05	28.53	15.47	11.02	94.14	52.74	12.45
每任务耗时秒	737.75	607.02	401.00	296.90	227.60	908.14	791.64	350.25

上下文窗口	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	500k	500k	500k
开发商	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	SpaceXAI	SpaceXAI	SpaceXAI
许可证	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有
输入模态	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像
输出模态	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本
服务商

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

每任务成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Grok 4.7

Claude Fable 5.1

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

GDPval-AA v2.1

单任务成本（美元，对数刻度）

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Not publicly available

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

能力得分

能力指数

衡量模型在特定能力与行业中的表现

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

Grok 4.7 vs. Claude Fable 5.1：发布比较

智能

速度

每任务成本

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

能力得分

能力指数