Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Claude Opus 5.5：发布比较

Gemini 4 Carbon 与 Claude Opus 5.5 发布比较：分别包含 2 个和 5 个模型，各自具有不同的智能、性能与价格特征。下方对全部 7 个模型的关键指标进行了比较。

智能方面，Gemini 4 Carbon 得分最高：Gemini 4 Carbon (High)（59），Claude Opus 5.5 为 Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)（58）。
输出速度方面，Claude Opus 5.5 最快：Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)（96 token/秒），Gemini 4 Carbon 为 Gemini 4 Carbon (High)（95 token/秒）。
单任务成本方面，Claude Opus 5.5 最低：Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)（$0.98），Gemini 4 Carbon 为 Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)（$6.59）。

比较的发布


	Gemini 4 Carbon (high)	Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)	Gemini 4 Carbon (medium)	Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (high with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (medium with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (low with fallback)
Intelligence Index	59	58	58	57	52	48	35
财务与会计	63	59	60	56	53	51	42
战略与运营	61	61	58	59	58	56	48
法律	62	58	59	55	52	50	43
医疗与健康	--	58	--	56	52	51	45
工程	65	65	63	62	58	54	43
经济学	61	62	59	60	57	54	45
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1610	1801	1602	1761	1682	1622	1279
AutomationBench-AA	77.8%	69.5%	77.6%	65.0%	63.2%	61.2%	52.9%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	65.2%	59.6%	60.6%	59.6%	56.6%	52.5%	31.3%
FrontierCode 2.0	40.6%	46.4%	39.5%	43.8%	35.9%	33.1%	15.8%
AA-Omniscience v1.1	54	48	47	43	42	40	39
GDP.pdf	28.4%	26.2%	29.6%	26.6%	28.8%	25.6%	25.6%
HLE-Diamond	69.1%	67.9%	67.4%	64.0%	55.6%	51.4%	41.7%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)	63.0%	61.0%	63.5%	63.0%	58.0%	52.5%	33.5%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1	64.8%	59.0%	62.4%	61.9%	49.0%	43.3%	24.3%

每任务成本美元	$7.76	$10.04	$6.59	$6.05	$3.46	$2.45	$0.98
输入价格美元/100 万 Token	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00
输出价格美元/100 万 Token	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00
缓存命中价格美元/100 万 Token	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20
缓存写入价格美元/100 万 Token	$4.00	$5.00	$4.00	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00

输出速度Token/秒	95	96	--	82	80	80	79
首 Token 延迟秒	137.57	728.68	--	128.76	47.50	19.85	10.33
首个回答 Token 时间秒	137.57	728.68	--	128.76	47.50	19.85	10.33
端到端响应时间秒	142.86	733.91	--	134.85	53.79	26.11	16.65
每任务耗时秒	1,295.46	1,136.95	--	785.05	471.95	340.22	149.58

上下文窗口	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
开发商	Google	Anthropic	Google	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic
许可证	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有
输入模态	支持：文本、图像、语音和视频	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本、图像、语音和视频	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像
输出模态	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本
服务商

Updated

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

No publicly available API

速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

No publicly available API

每任务成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

No publicly available API

智能Updated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

No publicly available API

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Gemini 4 Carbon

Claude Opus 5.5

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AutomationBench-AA

单任务成本（美元，对数刻度）

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

No publicly available API

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

No publicly available API

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

能力得分

能力指数

衡量模型在特定能力与行业中的表现

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

基准测试

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

性格指数

每个轴对应 8 个性格指数之一：其特质 Elo z 分数的平均值，在基准测试中所有已评估模型之间换算为 1 到 100 的百分位排名

Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Claude Opus 5.5：发布比较

智能

速度

每任务成本

智能Updated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

能力得分

能力指数

基准测试

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

性格指数