Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash：发布比较

Claude Opus 5.5 与 Gemini 3.8 Flash 发布比较：分别包含 5 个和 3 个模型，各自具有不同的智能、性能与价格特征。下方对全部 8 个模型的关键指标进行了比较。

智能方面，Claude Opus 5.5 得分最高：Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)（58），Gemini 3.8 Flash 为 Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)（41）。
输出速度方面，Gemini 3.8 Flash 最快：Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)（133 token/秒），Claude Opus 5.5 为 Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)（96 token/秒）。
单任务成本方面，Claude Opus 5.5 最低：Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)（$0.55），Gemini 3.8 Flash 为 Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)（$0.93）。

比较的发布


	Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (high with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (medium with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (low with fallback)	Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)	Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)	Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)
Intelligence Index	58	56	54	51	42	41	40	33
财务与会计	61	58	56	54	46	47	45	39
战略与运营	64	62	59	57	48	48	48	39
法律	63	61	59	57	52	52	51	45
医疗与健康	61	--	--	--	--	42	--	--
工程	60	59	56	54	45	43	40	34
经济学	66	63	61	60	53	52	50	46
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1807	1766	1690	1627	1279	1203	1181	1062
GDPval-AA v2.1	1866	1836	1705	1584	1234	1436	1422	1307
AutomationBench-AA	69.5%	65.0%	63.2%	61.2%	52.9%	59.9%	60.9%	36.5%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	59.6%	59.6%	56.6%	52.5%	31.3%	19.7%	19.7%	10.1%
SciCode	66.9%	65.0%	60.4%	59.3%	58.6%	56.6%	55.1%	55.0%
Humanity's Last Exam	61.4%	57.5%	55.6%	54.7%	48.3%	47.8%	42.1%	37.1%
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.6%	28.8%	25.6%	25.6%	21.0%	22.8%	18.6%
CritPt	31.7%	31.7%	30.9%	27.7%	17.7%	18.3%	12.3%	4.0%
AA-Omniscience	46	43	41	40	39	30	29	21
AA-LCR v1.1	84.7%	84.7%	82.7%	84.3%	80.7%	81.3%	84.0%	80.7%

每任务成本美元	$5.98	$3.46	$1.82	$1.34	$0.55	$1.24	$0.93	--
输入价格美元/100 万 Token	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$0.75	$0.75	$0.75
输出价格美元/100 万 Token	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$3.75	$3.75	$3.75
缓存命中价格美元/100 万 Token	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.075	$0.075	$0.075
缓存写入价格美元/100 万 Token	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$0.75	$0.75	$0.75

输出速度Token/秒	96	81	82	79	80	133	--	--
首 Token 延迟秒	748.61	154.80	45.11	23.85	12.35	20.94	--	--
首个回答 Token 时间秒	748.61	154.80	45.11	23.85	12.35	20.94	--	--
端到端响应时间秒	753.84	160.94	51.20	30.19	18.60	24.70	--	--
每任务耗时秒	780.94	496.52	276.27	202.93	80.85	522.40	--	--

上下文窗口	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
开发商	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Google	Google	Google
许可证	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有
输入模态	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本、图像、语音和视频	支持：文本、图像、语音和视频	支持：文本、图像、语音和视频
输出模态	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本
服务商

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

每任务成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

No publicly available API

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Claude Opus 5.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

GDPval-AA v2.1

单任务成本（美元，对数刻度）

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

No publicly available API

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

能力得分

能力指数

衡量模型在特定能力与行业中的表现

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash：发布比较

智能

速度

每任务成本

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

能力得分

能力指数