Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7：发布比较

Claude Haiku 5.5 与 Grok 4.7 发布比较：分别包含 5 个和 3 个模型，各自具有不同的智能、性能与价格特征。下方对全部 8 个模型的关键指标进行了比较。

智能方面，Claude Haiku 5.5 得分最高：Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)（36），Grok 4.7 为 Grok 4.7 (High)（35）。
输出速度方面，Claude Haiku 5.5 最快：Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)（241 token/秒），Grok 4.7 为 Grok 4.7 (High)（97 token/秒）。
单任务成本方面，Claude Haiku 5.5 最低：Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)（$0.04），Grok 4.7 为 Grok 4.7 (Low)（$2.92）。

比较的发布


	Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)	Grok 4.7 (high)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)	Grok 4.7 (xhigh)	Grok 4.7 (low)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Intelligence Index	36	35	34	34	31	30	25	19
财务与会计	44	51	41	52	45	38	35	29
战略与运营	39	53	39	55	49	37	33	27
法律	39	47	37	47	44	35	33	27
医疗与健康	37	46	34	47	43	32	31	25
工程	42	41	40	41	37	36	32	27
经济学	44	47	43	48	43	39	36	30
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1575	1629	1524	1638	1494	1440	1369	1114
AutomationBench-AA	35.4%	63.5%	36.0%	65.6%	56.7%	33.7%	28.6%	22.9%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	32.8%	24.7%	29.3%	25.8%	16.2%	21.7%	15.2%	12.6%
FrontierCode 2.0	34.9%	27.8%	29.9%	28.7%	21.8%	23.2%	16.1%	8.0%
AA-Omniscience v1.1	12	30	8	31	27	5	4	2
GDP.pdf	20.8%	23.2%	18.2%	20.0%	21.4%	17.2%	15.2%	11.2%
HLE-Diamond	29.6%	23.6%	28.8%	23.2%	18.5%	23.7%	16.8%	14.1%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)	41.0%	35.0%	44.5%	32.0%	41.0%	42.5%	30.0%	21.5%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1	20.0%	9.5%	18.1%	4.8%	4.8%	10.0%	7.1%	1.9%

每任务成本美元	$0.41	$6.18	$0.25	$7.51	$2.92	$0.16	$0.09	$0.04
输入价格美元/100 万 Token	$0.10	$2.00	$0.10	$2.00	$2.00	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
输出价格美元/100 万 Token	$0.50	$6.00	$0.50	$6.00	$6.00	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50
缓存命中价格美元/100 万 Token	$0.01	$0.50	$0.01	$0.50	$0.50	$0.01	$0.01	$0.01
缓存写入价格美元/100 万 Token	$0.125	--	$0.125	--	--	$0.125	$0.125	$0.125

输出速度Token/秒	241	97	196	89	77	187	175	185
首 Token 延迟秒	310.72	21.63	67.20	53.89	5.43	24.31	10.36	7.51
首个回答 Token 时间秒	310.72	21.63	67.20	53.89	5.43	24.31	10.36	7.51
端到端响应时间秒	312.80	26.78	69.75	59.52	11.90	26.99	13.21	10.22
每任务耗时秒	593.47	952.51	441.28	991.12	537.92	298.26	192.95	97.99

上下文窗口	1M	500k	1M	500k	500k	1M	1M	1M
开发商	Anthropic	SpaceXAI	Anthropic	SpaceXAI	SpaceXAI	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic
许可证	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有	专有
输入模态	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像	支持：文本和图像
输出模态	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本	支持：文本
服务商

Updated

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

每任务成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

智能Updated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Claude Haiku 5.5

Grok 4.7

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AutomationBench-AA

单任务成本（美元，对数刻度）

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

能力得分

能力指数

衡量模型在特定能力与行业中的表现

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

基准测试

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

模型 Avs模型 B

AA-PersonalityBench：Expressiveness 指数，Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) vs Grok 4.7 (xhigh)

根据两者的 Elo 差距，每个模型的回答在各特质上被判定为更显著的概率 · 50% 表示势均力敌

Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)

Grok 4.7 (xhigh)

Eloquent

22%

78%

Lexically Varied

70%

30%

Metaphorical

59%

41%

Literate

59%

41%

Natural Sounding

55%

45%

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7：发布比较

智能

速度

每任务成本

智能Updated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index 与每项任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

成本

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

速度与延迟

输出速度

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

能力得分

能力指数

基准测试

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench：Expressiveness 指数，Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) vs Grok 4.7 (xhigh)