Muse Wonder vs. Claude Haiku 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos Muse Wonder y Claude Haiku 5.5: 2 y 5 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 7 modelos.

En inteligencia, Muse Wonder obtiene la puntuación más alta: Muse Wonder (Max), con 44, frente a Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max), con 36 de Claude Haiku 5.5.
En tiempo por tarea, Claude Haiku 5.5 es el más rápido: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low), con 2,2 min, frente a Muse Wonder (High), con 9,0 min de Muse Wonder.
En costo por tarea, Claude Haiku 5.5 es el más económico: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low), con $0.04, frente a Muse Wonder (Max), con $6.95 de Muse Wonder.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Muse Wonder (max)	Muse Wonder (high)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)	Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Intelligence Index	44	41	36	35	30	25	19
Finanzas y contabilidad	51	50	44	41	38	35	29
Estrategia y operaciones	54	54	39	39	37	33	27
Jurídico	47	46	39	37	35	33	27
Salud y medicina	49	--	37	34	32	31	25
Ingeniería	50	47	43	41	37	32	27
Economía	50	48	43	41	38	34	29
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1659	1610	1574	1523	1441	1367	1114
AutomationBench-AA	68.1%	67.2%	35.4%	36.0%	33.7%	28.6%	22.9%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	52.0%	38.4%	32.8%	29.3%	21.7%	15.2%	12.6%
FrontierCode 2.0	27.9%	26.6%	34.9%	29.9%	23.2%	16.1%	8.0%
AA-Omniscience v1.1	25	25	12	8	5	4	2
GDP.pdf	30.6%	29.2%	20.8%	18.2%	17.2%	15.2%	11.2%
HLE-Diamond	39.0%	34.5%	29.6%	28.8%	23.7%	16.8%	14.1%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)	50.5%	51.0%	43.5%	47.5%	45.0%	30.5%	21.5%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1	25.7%	21.9%	20.0%	18.1%	10.0%	7.1%	1.9%

Costo por tareaUSD	$6.95	--	$0.41	$0.25	$0.16	$0.09	$0.04
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$4.00	$4.00	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$20.00	$20.00	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50	$0.50
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.20	$0.20	$0.01	$0.01	$0.01	$0.01	$0.01
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	--	--	$0.125	$0.125	$0.125	$0.125	$0.125

Tiempo por tareaMinutos	12,1	9,0	14,6	9,5	6,7	4,0	2,2
Velocidad de salidatok/s	132	126	258	240	220	224	218
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	20,24	8,97	178,49	48,80	22,64	11,28	9,13
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	20,24	8,97	178,49	48,80	22,64	11,28	9,13
Tiempo de extremo a extremoMedia de las cargas de solicitud única (s)	62,98	34,41	332,08	99,94	53,92	37,59	32,99

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creador	Meta	Meta	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto, imágenes, voz y video	Admite: texto, imágenes, voz y video	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores

Updated

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Tiempo por tarea

Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

No publicly available API

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Claude Haiku 5.5

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AutomationBench-AA

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

No publicly available API

Velocidad y latencia

Tiempo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better

No publicly available API

The weighted average time (minutes) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task: output tokens per task divided by output speed, weighted by each benchmark's weight in the Intelligence Index.

Speed and latency metrics average each endpoint's runs over the past 5 days, and the error rate pools them. We run the benchmark every 6 hours, and endpoints of deprecated models every 18 hours.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Modelo Avs.Modelo B

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Muse Wonder (max) vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)

Probabilidad de que la respuesta de cada modelo sea juzgada como la que muestra más cada rasgo, según su diferencia de Elo · 50 % es un empate

Muse Wonder (max)

Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)

Eloquent

90 %

10 %

Metaphorical

87 %

13 %

Literate

15 %

85 %

Natural Sounding

59 %

41 %

Lexically Varied

54 %

46 %

Muse Wonder vs. Claude Haiku 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Tiempo por tarea

Costo por tarea

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Tiempo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Time Period

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Muse Wonder (max) vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)