GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos GPT-6.1 Sol y Claude Sonnet 5.5: 5 y 5 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 10 modelos.

En inteligencia, Claude Sonnet 5.5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 56, frente a GPT-6.1 Sol (Max), con 52 de GPT-6.1 Sol.
En velocidad de salida, Claude Sonnet 5.5 es el más rápido: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 134 tokens/s, frente a GPT-6.1 Sol (Max), con 56 tokens/s de GPT-6.1 Sol.
En costo por tarea, GPT-6.1 Sol es el más económico: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low), con $0.13, frente a Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback), con $0.35 de Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (max)	GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh)	GPT-6.1 Sol (high)	GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (low)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium with fallback)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low with fallback)
Intelligence Index	56	52	52	51	50	48	47	42	41	36
Finanzas y contabilidad	57	52	54	53	53	50	47	45	41	38
Estrategia y operaciones	60	56	57	56	55	53	52	46	45	41
Jurídico	56	52	58	57	56	54	49	50	44	41
Salud y medicina	58	--	51	--	--	--	--	--	--	--
Ingeniería	58	54	54	53	52	50	48	44	42	38
Economía	61	56	59	58	58	56	52	52	47	44
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1817	1751	1557	1504	1465	1361	1636	1117	1441	1272
GDPval-AA v2.1	1838	1728	1594	1538	1511	1450	1549	1315	1323	1175
AutomationBench-AA	71.8%	65.5%	64.9%	66.6%	64.5%	62.6%	59.4%	52.6%	54.9%	49.4%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	63.6%	57.1%	56.1%	54.0%	51.5%	48.0%	43.9%	30.8%	29.8%	20.7%
SciCode	61.0%	57.3%	54.2%	55.7%	55.8%	53.2%	53.7%	53.2%	52.9%	49.1%
Humanity's Last Exam	55.0%	50.0%	52.9%	52.6%	51.4%	49.9%	45.8%	47.4%	39.8%	36.2%
GDP.pdf	25.8%	24.6%	31.0%	31.8%	32.0%	30.0%	25.2%	27.0%	20.2%	16.0%
CritPt	31.4%	31.1%	31.7%	31.7%	30.0%	27.7%	24.6%	24.9%	16.9%	11.4%
AA-Omniscience	32	24	42	41	41	40	21	38	20	19
AA-LCR v1.1	82.7%	79.7%	83.0%	79.7%	82.3%	83.3%	78.0%	84.0%	76.3%	76.0%

Costo por tareaUSD	$5.46	$2.01	$0.72	$0.39	$0.32	$0.21	$0.88	$0.13	$0.48	$0.35
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50

Velocidad de salidaTokens/s	134	112	56	53	49	45	106	44	108	109
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	384,95	31,59	206,49	133,08	37,49	4,12	10,46	2,80	1,29	1,17
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	384,95	31,59	206,49	133,08	37,49	4,12	10,46	2,80	1,29	1,17
Tiempo de respuesta de extremo a extremos	388,68	36,05	215,45	142,47	47,70	15,19	15,16	14,30	5,93	5,76
Tiempo por tareas	908,68	424,12	680,58	322,40	261,19	179,89	216,82	89,57	122,29	82,15

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creador	Anthropic	Anthropic	OpenAI	OpenAI	OpenAI	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI	Anthropic	Anthropic
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidad

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

GPT-6.1 Sol

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

GDPval-AA v2.1

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Model AvsModel B

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match

GPT-6.1 Sol (max)

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)

Lexically Varied

91%

Metaphorical

12%

88%

Natural Sounding

62%

38%

Eloquent

40%

60%

Literate

52%

48%

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Velocidad

Costo por tarea

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)