GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos GPT-6.1 Sol y Claude Opus 5.5: 5 y 5 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 10 modelos.

En inteligencia, Claude Opus 5.5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 58, frente a GPT-6.1 Sol (Max), con 52 de GPT-6.1 Sol.
En velocidad de salida, Claude Opus 5.5 es el más rápido: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 94 tokens/s, frente a GPT-6.1 Sol (Max), con 55 tokens/s de GPT-6.1 Sol.
En costo por tarea, GPT-6.1 Sol es el más económico: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low), con $0.13, frente a Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback), con $0.55 de Claude Opus 5.5.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh with fallback)	Claude Opus 5.5 (high with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (max)	Claude Opus 5.5 (medium with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh)	GPT-6.1 Sol (high)	GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)	Claude Opus 5.5 (low with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (low)
Intelligence Index	58	56	54	52	51	51	50	48	42	42
Finanzas y contabilidad	61	58	56	54	54	53	53	50	46	45
Estrategia y operaciones	64	62	59	57	57	56	55	53	48	46
Jurídico	63	61	59	58	57	57	56	54	52	50
Salud y medicina	61	--	--	51	--	--	--	--	--	--
Ingeniería	60	59	56	54	54	53	52	50	45	44
Economía	66	63	61	59	60	58	58	56	53	52
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1803	1764	1686	1557	1625	1504	1465	1361	1280	1117
GDPval-AA v2.1	1866	1831	1704	1594	1584	1538	1511	1450	1235	1315
AutomationBench-AA	69.5%	65.0%	63.2%	64.9%	61.2%	66.6%	64.5%	62.6%	52.9%	52.6%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	59.6%	59.6%	56.6%	56.1%	52.5%	54.0%	51.5%	48.0%	31.3%	30.8%
SciCode	66.9%	65.0%	60.4%	54.2%	59.3%	55.7%	55.8%	53.2%	58.6%	53.2%
Humanity's Last Exam	61.4%	57.5%	55.6%	52.9%	54.7%	52.6%	51.4%	49.9%	48.3%	47.4%
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.6%	28.8%	31.0%	25.6%	31.8%	32.0%	30.0%	25.6%	27.0%
CritPt	31.7%	31.7%	30.9%	31.7%	27.7%	31.7%	30.0%	27.7%	17.7%	24.9%
AA-Omniscience	46	43	41	42	40	41	41	40	39	38
AA-LCR v1.1	84.7%	84.7%	82.7%	83.0%	84.3%	79.7%	82.3%	83.3%	80.7%	84.0%

Costo por tareaUSD	$5.98	$3.46	$1.82	$0.72	$1.34	$0.39	$0.32	$0.21	$0.55	$0.13
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$4.00	$4.00	$4.00	$2.00	$4.00	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$4.00	$2.00
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$20.00	$20.00	$20.00	$10.00	$20.00	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$20.00	$10.00
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.20	$0.20	$0.20	$0.10	$0.20	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.20	$0.10
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$5.00	$5.00	$5.00	$2.50	$5.00	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	$5.00	$2.50

Velocidad de salidaTokens/s	94	83	80	55	80	52	48	44	79	43
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	562,75	115,10	32,55	239,97	20,83	133,08	40,09	4,12	4,90	2,80
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	562,75	115,10	32,55	239,97	20,83	133,08	40,09	4,12	4,90	2,80
Tiempo de respuesta de extremo a extremos	568,05	121,11	38,83	249,02	27,11	142,75	50,55	15,54	11,26	14,42
Tiempo por tareas	799,71	498,24	275,91	687,68	200,07	337,39	266,05	183,98	79,20	91,58

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creador	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI	OpenAI	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidad

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

GPT-6.1 Sol

Claude Opus 5.5

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

GDPval-AA v2.1

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Model AvsModel B

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match

GPT-6.1 Sol (max)

Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)

Lexically Varied

98%

Metaphorical

94%

Eloquent

17%

83%

Natural Sounding

38%

62%

Literate

41%

59%

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Velocidad

Costo por tarea

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)