GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.1: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos GPT-6.1 Sol y Claude Fable 5.1: 5 y 5 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 10 modelos.

En inteligencia, Claude Fable 5.1 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback), con 53, frente a GPT-6.1 Sol (Max), con 52 de GPT-6.1 Sol.
En velocidad de salida, Claude Fable 5.1 es el más rápido: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback), con 69 tokens/s, frente a GPT-6.1 Sol (Max), con 55 tokens/s de GPT-6.1 Sol.
En costo por tarea, GPT-6.1 Sol es el más económico: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low), con $0.13, frente a Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback), con $2.37 de Claude Fable 5.1.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (max)	Claude Fable 5.1 (high with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh)	GPT-6.1 Sol (high)	Claude Fable 5.1 (medium with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)	Claude Fable 5.1 (low with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (low)
Intelligence Index	53	53	52	51	51	50	49	48	47	42
Finanzas y contabilidad	56	56	54	54	53	53	51	50	49	45
Estrategia y operaciones	60	58	57	56	56	55	54	53	51	46
Jurídico	60	61	58	58	57	56	57	54	53	50
Salud y medicina	58	--	51	--	--	--	--	--	--	--
Ingeniería	56	57	54	54	53	52	51	50	49	44
Economía	63	62	59	60	58	58	58	56	55	52
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1672	1655	1557	1580	1504	1465	1528	1361	1482	1117
GDPval-AA v2.1	1754	1732	1594	1635	1538	1511	1545	1450	1469	1315
AutomationBench-AA	59.4%	57.8%	64.9%	55.3%	66.6%	64.5%	54.7%	62.6%	52.2%	52.6%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	52.0%	55.1%	56.1%	52.0%	54.0%	51.5%	44.9%	48.0%	40.4%	30.8%
SciCode	63.1%	60.9%	54.2%	58.7%	55.7%	55.8%	56.4%	53.2%	56.7%	53.2%
Humanity's Last Exam	59.1%	58.7%	52.9%	55.9%	52.6%	51.4%	53.8%	49.9%	48.9%	47.4%
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.2%	31.0%	26.8%	31.8%	32.0%	26.8%	30.0%	28.0%	27.0%
CritPt	29.7%	31.1%	31.7%	30.3%	31.7%	30.0%	29.1%	27.7%	27.7%	24.9%
AA-Omniscience	43	42	42	41	41	41	38	40	34	38
AA-LCR v1.1	85.3%	83.0%	83.0%	83.7%	79.7%	82.3%	84.7%	83.3%	82.3%	84.0%

Costo por tareaUSD	$7.63	$5.98	$0.72	$3.91	$0.39	$0.32	$2.98	$0.21	$2.37	$0.13
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$10.00	$10.00	$2.00	$10.00	$2.00	$2.00	$10.00	$2.00	$10.00	$2.00
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$50.00	$50.00	$10.00	$50.00	$10.00	$10.00	$50.00	$10.00	$50.00	$10.00
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.25	$0.25	$0.10	$0.25	$0.10	$0.10	$0.25	$0.10	$0.25	$0.10
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$12.50	$12.50	$2.50	$12.50	$2.50	$2.50	$12.50	$2.50	$12.50	$2.50

Velocidad de salidaTokens/s	69	64	55	58	52	49	56	45	57	43
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	190,98	84,45	244,06	19,45	161,76	49,77	3,19	4,58	2,10	2,95
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	190,98	84,45	244,06	19,45	161,76	49,77	3,19	4,58	2,10	2,95
Tiempo de respuesta de extremo a extremos	198,25	92,29	253,11	28,02	171,43	59,98	12,14	15,67	10,81	14,56
Tiempo por tareas	727,85	601,94	687,99	401,81	337,39	261,19	301,72	181,38	234,69	91,58

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creador	Anthropic	Anthropic	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidad

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

GPT-6.1 Sol

Claude Fable 5.1

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

GDPval-AA v2.1

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Model AvsModel B

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match

GPT-6.1 Sol (max)

Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)

Lexically Varied

99%

Eloquent

98%

Metaphorical

95%

Natural Sounding

94%

Literate

44%

56%

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.1: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Velocidad

Costo por tarea

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Velocidad de salida

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)