DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 27B: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos DeepSeek V4.1 Flash y Qwen3.8 27B: 2 y 4 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 6 modelos.
- En inteligencia, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash obtiene la puntuación más alta: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort), con 39, frente a Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh), con 34 de Qwen3.8 27B.
- En velocidad de salida, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash es el más rápido: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-Reasoning), con 296 tokens/s, frente a Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning), con 51 tokens/s de Qwen3.8 27B.
- En costo por tarea, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash es el más económico: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-Reasoning), con $0.15, frente a Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh), con $1.01 de Qwen3.8 27B.
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) |  DeepSeek | 39 | 45 | 52 | 41 | 41 | 39 | 44 | $0.27 | 0,2 US$ | $0.30 | $1.20 | $0.006 | 477 US$ | 89k | 63k | 253M | 222 | 0.92s | 9.94s | 12.20s | 304.19s | 552B 16B activos en inferencia | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto |    +15 | |||
| Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) |  Alibaba | 34 | 34 | 37 | 35 | 34 | 33 | 43 | $1.01 | 0,5 US$ | $0.50 | $3.00 | $0.10 | 1336 US$ | 67k | 48k | 198M | 41 | 4.04s | 52.54s | 64.67s | 1315.67s | 27B | 256k | ago 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto |  +4 | |||
| Qwen3.8 27B (medium) | Alibaba | 28 | 28 | 34 | 27 | - | 25 | 31 | $1.13 | 0,5 US$ | $0.50 | $3.00 | $0.10 | 1165 US$ | 52k | 32k | 113M | 49 | 3.84s | 44.47s | 54.63s | 1017.92s | 27B | 256k | ago 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto |  | |||
| Qwen3.8 27B (low) | Alibaba | 26 | 27 | 29 | 28 | - | 24 | 32 | $1.05 | 0,5 US$ | $0.50 | $3.00 | $0.10 | 1060 US$ | 45k | 26k | 82M | 47 | 3.84s | 46.34s | 56.96s | 914.24s | 27B | 256k | ago 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto | | |||
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-Reasoning) | DeepSeek | 25 | 30 | 36 | 30 | - | 25 | 32 | $0.15 | 0,2 US$ | $0.30 | $1.20 | $0.006 | 156 US$ | 34k | 0 | 45M | 296 | 1.16s | 1.16s | 2.85s | 116.47s | 552B 16B activos en inferencia | 1M | sept 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | | |||
| Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Alibaba | 20 | 19 | 16 | 22 | - | 22 | 30 | $2.49 | 0,5 US$ | $0.50 | $3.00 | $0.10 | 2022 US$ | 30k | 0 | 43M | 51 | 3.90s | 3.90s | 13.80s | 568.10s | 27B | 256k | ago 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto, imágenes y video | Admite: texto |   | |||