DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Nova 2.0 Lite: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos DeepSeek V4.1 Flash y Nova 2.0 Lite: 2 y 4 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 6 modelos.
- En inteligencia, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash obtiene la puntuación más alta: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort), con 39, frente a Nova 2.0 Lite (high), con 13 de Nova 2.0 Lite.
- En velocidad de salida, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash es el más rápido: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-Reasoning), con 296 tokens/s, frente a Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning), con 175 tokens/s de Nova 2.0 Lite.
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) | 39 | 45 | 52 | 41 | 41 | 39 | 44 | $0.27 | 0,2 US$ | $0.30 | $1.20 | $0.006 | 477 US$ | 89k | 63k | 253M | 222 | 0.92s | 9.94s | 12.20s | 304.19s | 552B 16B activos en inferencia | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | +15 | ||||
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-Reasoning) | 25 | 30 | 36 | 30 | - | 25 | 32 | $0.15 | 0,2 US$ | $0.30 | $1.20 | $0.006 | 156 US$ | 34k | 0 | 45M | 296 | 1.16s | 1.16s | 2.85s | 116.47s | 552B 16B activos en inferencia | 1M | sept 2026 | - | No | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | |||||
| Nova 2.0 Lite (high) | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,5 US$ | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 169 | 14.14s | 25.99s | 28.95s | - | - | 1M | oct 2025 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | |||
| Nova 2.0 Lite (medium) | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,5 US$ | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 151 | 12.23s | 25.44s | 28.74s | - | - | 1M | oct 2025 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | |||
| Nova 2.0 Lite (low) | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,5 US$ | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 171 | 8.76s | 20.48s | 23.42s | - | - | 1M | oct 2025 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | |||
| Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning) | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0,5 US$ | $0.30 | $2.50 | - | - | - | - | - | 175 | 1.04s | 1.04s | 3.90s | - | - | 1M | oct 2025 | - | No | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | |||