Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B: comparación de lanzamientos
Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Sonnet 5.5 y Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B: 5 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 7 modelos.
- En inteligencia, Claude Sonnet 5.5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback), con 56, frente a Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Reasoning), con 7 de Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B.
Inteligencia
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Costo
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Velocidad y latencia
Output Speed
Puntuaciones de capacidades
Índices de capacidades
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Más detalles
Modalidad de entrada | Modalidad de salida | Pesos | Benchmarks de proveedores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |  Anthropic | 56 | 57 | 60 | 56 | - | 58 | 61 | $7.60 | 1,5 US$ | $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.20 | 8977 US$ | 193k | 142k | 411M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 52 | 52 | 56 | 52 | - | 54 | 56 | $2.74 | 1,5 US$ | $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.20 | 2738 US$ | 74k | 48k | 104M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 47 | 47 | 52 | 49 | - | 48 | 52 | $1.08 | 1,5 US$ | $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.20 | 1176 US$ | 34k | 18k | 50M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 41 | 41 | 45 | 44 | - | 42 | 47 | $0.59 | 1,5 US$ | $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.20 | 701 US$ | 19k | 8k | 29M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) | Anthropic | 36 | 37 | 41 | 40 | - | 38 | 44 | $0.41 | 1,5 US$ | $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.20 | 544 US$ | 14k | 5k | 23M | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1M | sept 2026 | - | Sí | Admite: texto e imágenes | Admite: texto | No disponible | - | | |
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Reasoning) |  Nous Research | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,2 US$ | $1.00 | $3.00 | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | 2.32s | 48.32s | 59.82s | - | 406B | 128k | ago 2025 | - | Sí | Admite: texto | Admite: texto |  | |||
| Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) | Nous Research | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,2 US$ | $1.00 | $3.00 | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 2.32s | 2.32s | 13.80s | - | 406B | 128k | ago 2025 | - | No | Admite: texto | Admite: texto | | |||