Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3: comparación de lanzamientos

Name: Inteligencia
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparación de los lanzamientos Claude Sonnet 5.5 y GLM-5.3: 5 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 7 modelos.

En inteligencia, Claude Sonnet 5.5 obtiene la puntuación más alta: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback), con 55, frente a GLM-5.3 (Max), con 32 de GLM-5.3.
En tiempo por tarea, Claude Sonnet 5.5 es el más rápido: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback), con 2.6 min, frente a GLM-5.3 (Low), con 15.9 min de GLM-5.3.
En costo por tarea, Claude Sonnet 5.5 es el más económico: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback), con $0.51, frente a GLM-5.3 (Low), con $1.57 de GLM-5.3.

Playground de modelos

Lanzamientos comparados


	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)	GLM-5.3 (max)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)	GLM-5.3 (low)
Intelligence Index	55	50	42	32	31	26	23
Finanzas y contabilidad	56	49	44	42	41	36	31
Estrategia y operaciones	58	54	51	47	47	42	38
Jurídico	52	47	44	36	39	37	28
Salud y medicina	54	47	44	39	40	37	31
Ingeniería	58	54	46	38	37	33	28
Economía	54	48	45	37	39	35	29
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1813	1742	1634	1503	1439	1268	1185
AutomationBench-AA	71.8%	65.5%	59.4%	62.2%	54.9%	49.4%	52.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	63.6%	57.1%	43.9%	41.9%	29.8%	20.7%	34.8%
FrontierCode 2.0	41.7%	35.6%	25.7%	21.6%	11.0%	7.1%	12.7%
AA-Omniscience v1.1	30	21	19	6	19	20	−11
GDP.pdf	25.8%	24.6%	25.2%	11.2%	20.2%	16.0%	8.8%
HLE-Diamond	53.3%	44.1%	33.8%	17.9%	23.8%	20.6%	17.5%
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)	59.0%	57.5%	51.5%	33.5%	33.5%	26.0%	21.5%
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1	53.3%	52.4%	34.3%	9.5%	16.2%	10.5%	3.8%

Costo por tareaUSD	$10.02	$4.09	$1.64	$5.01	$0.78	$0.51	$1.57
Precio de entradaUSD/1M tokens	$2.00	$2.00	$2.00	$1.40	$2.00	$2.00	$1.40
Precio de salidaUSD/1M tokens	$10.00	$10.00	$10.00	$4.40	$10.00	$10.00	$4.40
Precio de lectura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10	$0.26	$0.10	$0.10	$0.26
Precio de escritura de cachéUSD/1M tokens	$2.50	$2.50	$2.50	--	$2.50	$2.50	--

Tiempo por tareaMinutos	31.5	15.3	7.2	29.2	3.7	2.6	15.9
Velocidad de salidatok/s	151	134	136	68	139	133	55
Tiempo hasta el primer token de respuestas	310.29	27.39	9.33	81.53	4.26	2.40	13.04
Tiempo hasta el primer tokens	310.29	27.39	9.33	3.03	4.26	2.40	3.57
Tiempo de extremo a extremoMedia de las cargas de solicitud única (s)	614.40	74.89	40.87	160.11	26.02	21.44	38.73

Ventana de contexto	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creador	Anthropic	Anthropic	Anthropic	Z AI	Anthropic	Anthropic	Z AI
Licencia	Propietario	Propietario	Propietario	Abierto	Propietario	Propietario	Abierto
Modalidad de entrada	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto e imágenes	Admite: texto
Modalidad de salida	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto	Admite: texto
Proveedores				+21			+5

Updated

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Tiempo por tarea

Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Costo por tarea

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

No publicly available API

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Claude Sonnet 5.5

GLM-5.3

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

AutomationBench-AA

Costo por tarea (USD, escala logarítmica)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

No publicly available API

Velocidad y latencia

Tiempo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better

No publicly available API

The weighted average time (minutes) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task: output tokens per task divided by output speed, weighted by each benchmark's weight in the Intelligence Index.

Speed and latency metrics average each endpoint's runs over the past 5 days, and the error rate pools them. We run the benchmark every 6 hours, and endpoints of deprecated models every 18 hours.

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Modelo Avs.Modelo B

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) vs. GLM-5.3 (max)

Probabilidad de que la respuesta de cada modelo sea juzgada como la que muestra más cada rasgo, según su diferencia de Elo · 50 % es un empate

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)

GLM-5.3 (max)

Eloquent

97%

Natural Sounding

96%

Lexically Varied

91%

Metaphorical

27%

73%

Literate

58%

42%

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3: comparación de lanzamientos

Inteligencia

Tiempo por tarea

Costo por tarea

InteligenciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. costo por tarea

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Costo

Costo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Velocidad y latencia

Tiempo por tarea del Intelligence Index

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Time Period

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Benchmarks

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: índice Expressiveness, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) vs. GLM-5.3 (max)